From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1608 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2011 14:07:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 1598 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2011 14:07:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:06:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7OE6EL8004040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:06:14 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7OE6DXe001414; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:06:13 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7OE6AnG014661; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:06:10 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Dodji Seketeli Cc: Alexandre Oliva , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@integrable-solutions.net, joseph@codesourcery.com, burnus@net-b.de, charlet@act-europe.fr, paolo@gnu.org, jason@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Support -fdebug-cpp option References: <1291979498-1604-1-git-send-email-dodji@redhat.com> <1902ac92ebf0b213bfafdeb31edaac8812b5399b.1310824121.git.dodji@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Dodji Seketeli's message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:58:27 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg01999.txt.bz2 Tom> That exists -- -fdirectives-only. Jakub> It isn't exactly what would be needed, as e.g. \\\n are removed from Jakub> from #defines and thus they get different location of the tokens. Dodji> Would it be acceptable to just change the output of -fdirective to fit? Dodji> Or are we bound to not breaking existing consumers? I think changing it would be fine. Tom