From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7204 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2006 22:45:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 7194 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2006 22:45:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from yosemite.airs.com (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (205.217.158.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:45:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 14978 invoked by uid 10); 10 Jan 2006 22:45:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 2451 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2006 22:45:14 -0000 To: Jan Hubicka Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com Subject: Re: Patch ping... References: <20060110214151.GA1799@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:45:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20060110214151.GA1799@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00556.txt.bz2 Jan Hubicka writes: > the patch: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg01877.html > used to rearrange saving code in inliner is needed to proceed further on > IPA branch merging. Would be possible to take a look on it, please? OK, I tried to wrap my head around it. The update_clones_p field in inline_data needs a comment. The update_clones parameter to tree_function_versioning needs a comment. The comment "This means not lowering some constructs such as exception handling" in tree_rest_of_compilation no longer seems accurate. It now calls save_inline_function_body, which does appear to lower exception handling. OK with those changes. Thanks. Ian