From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Merrill <jason_merrill@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: fix sjlj eh vs dwarf2 debug
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 03:03:00 -0000
Message-id: <m3snetskrt.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <20010814121628.A30538@redhat.com> <20010814121921.A8417@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00900.html

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 12:16:28PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> * dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_frame_finish): Never emit .eh_frame
>> if USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS.

> Actually, I take that back.  Now that we are (or may be) encoding
> .eh_frame data in non-standard ways, we should probably not try to
> emit only one of .eh_frame or .debug_frame.  That way the debugger
> doesn't have to care about whatever funnies we do with augmentation.

> Jason, what are your thoughts?

That makes sense to me.  What do gdb folks think?

Jason