From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12870 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2010 09:24:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 12862 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2010 09:24:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:24:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBE9Ofvd005379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:24:41 -0500 Received: from adjoa.redhat.com (ovpn-113-36.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.36]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBE9OZVc017356; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:24:37 -0500 From: Dodji Seketeli To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: Jeff Law , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, tromey@redhat.com, joseph@codesourcery.com, lopezibanez@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Tracking locations of tokens resulting from macro expansion References: <1291979498-1604-1-git-send-email-dodji@redhat.com> <4D025930.6020000@redhat.com> <4D062D34.1050606@redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:45:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Gabriel Dos Reis's message of "Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:40:26 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg01079.txt.bz2 Gabriel Dos Reis writes: > My experience with GCC is that things are easier to get in than to take > out. And stage 1 is experimental and also the phase where you want > most feedback. IMHO, it isn't a good stage to let people opt out :-) Fair enough :-) -- Dodji