public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: PING: Re: patch: libiberty adjustments for _WIN64
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3y7gwkoz0.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFADFAEB2F.815B2727-ONC1257324.0027B55F-C1257324.0027F1F3@onevision.de>

Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com> writes:

> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote on 25.07.2007 23:48:07:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:51:02PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > 
> > > > As far as I can see, the type used here is never exposed outside of
> > > > the pex_run interface.
> > > 
> > > Hmmm.. maybe I was thinking of some other libiberty interface, then.
> > > Perhaps hash tables?
> > 
> > I think that was the splay tree keys.
> 
> Yes, the splay tree keys are this issue.
> 
> But why can't we use the 'pid_t' type for pex ?

Just because the pex code is intended to be highly portable, and not
every system defines a pid_t type.  You can use pid_t if you make sure
that it is defined reasonably.

Ian

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-01  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-25 13:11 Kai Tietz
2007-07-25 15:57 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-07-25 20:39   ` DJ Delorie
2007-07-25 20:53     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-07-25 21:25       ` DJ Delorie
2007-07-25 21:54         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-07-26  7:51           ` Kai Tietz
2007-08-01  1:45             ` Ian Lance Taylor [this message]
2007-08-03 13:09               ` Kai Tietz
2007-08-03 15:07                 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-08-03 15:21                   ` Kai Tietz
2007-08-03 15:30                     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-08-03 15:41                       ` Kai Tietz
2007-08-03 16:01                         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-08-03 16:10                           ` Kai Tietz
2007-08-03 15:01               ` patch: libiberty pex " Kai Tietz
     [not found] <OF00E7FD99.36C5E0BD-ONC1257310.0042A207-C1257310.00442A1C@LocalDomain>
2007-07-16  9:00 ` PING: Re: patch: libiberty adjustments " Kai Tietz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3y7gwkoz0.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=iant@google.com \
    --cc=Kai.Tietz@onevision.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).