From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29604 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2004 20:01:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29587 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2004 20:01:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO merlin.cs.tamu.edu) (131.107.59.85) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 20:01:41 -0000 Received: by merlin.cs.tamu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9778435562; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:01:39 -0500 (CDT) To: Nathan Sidwell Cc: lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [C++] My unreviewed patch References: <41740275.7060903@codesourcery.com> <41741359.4050707@codesourcery.com> From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: <41741359.4050707@codesourcery.com> Organization: Texas A&M University, Department of Computer Science Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01538.txt.bz2 Nathan Sidwell writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > Nathan Sidwell writes: | | > | It's a pity we can't actuall print out the mismatching template | > | parameters. | > Why can't we? | > -- Gaby | It's a tree_list, and we don't dump those (do we?). We don't currently dump template argument list, but we could -- it is no different from the way we currently dump tree_list for function arguments. -- Gaby