Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

> On Dec  3, 2010, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>
>> It currently requires a copyright license agreement.
>
> IIRC the agreement is a patent license as well, so describing it as a
> copyright license agreement isn't accurate either.  I think just
> “license agreement” would be fine.

Thanks.  I committed the following.

Ian