From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-305254-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10267 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2011 04:54:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 10257 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Oct 2011 04:54:20 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:54:05 +0000
Received: from hpaq3.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq3.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.3])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p9M4s4Wi001055	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:54:04 -0700
Received: from pzk36 (pzk36.prod.google.com [10.243.19.164])	by hpaq3.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p9M4rJWW002431	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT)	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:54:02 -0700
Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so16146002pzk.11        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.73.103 with SMTP id k7mr22877058pbv.30.1319259241931;        Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.73.103 with SMTP id k7mr22877043pbv.30.1319259241821;        Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from coign.google.com ([216.129.97.197])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jm5sm37886012pbc.1.2011.10.21.21.53.59        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Ping: demangle C++ extern "C" functions
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1109032229590.6207@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1110212053030.6478@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 05:54:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1110212053030.6478@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>	(Marc Glisse's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:59:33 +0200 (CEST)")
Message-ID: <mcripnhlj8a.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg02052.txt.bz2

Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> writes:

>> _Z1aIFYviEEvPT_
>> void a<void (int) extern "C">(void (*)(int) extern "C")

Does g++ ever actually generate a symbol name like this?  Is it worth
worrying about?


Personally if we are going to print this at all I think the extern "C"
should be in square brackets.  E.g.,

void a<void (int) [extern "C"]>(void (*)(int) [extern "C"])

Ian