From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-302547-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27627 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2011 22:25:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 27608 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Sep 2011 22:25:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.67)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:25:39 +0000
Received: from wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.97])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p8NMPbBE021755	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:25:38 -0700
Received: from ywt2 (ywt2.prod.google.com [10.192.20.2])	by wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p8NMOxVD025767	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT)	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:25:36 -0700
Received: by ywt2 with SMTP id 2so4304980ywt.40        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.38.169 with SMTP id h9mr5936939pbk.113.1316816736177;        Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.38.169 with SMTP id h9mr5936923pbk.113.1316816736022;        Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from coign.google.com ([2620:0:1000:2301:21c:25ff:fe14:8d86])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm42535785pbq.11.2011.09.23.15.25.35        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Ping: [libiberty patch] Add demangler support for cloned function symbols (PR 40831)
References: <CAHACq4qJ+yxHixtf_xud+rphr4N2=Qwbv3mS=YC2ezzfwiw6Yg@mail.gmail.com>	<20110923074928.GP2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>	<mcrpqirwbwg.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>	<CAHACq4qD53ukJzyk7s5qGNEq+GLUkHM6FyuLeEiu+K6SpwiUHQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAHACq4rXn4A4Uu5ot5Onvh6BJe5VSLdkNA7kWyvdtfSoT9=1EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:08:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAHACq4rXn4A4Uu5ot5Onvh6BJe5VSLdkNA7kWyvdtfSoT9=1EQ@mail.gmail.com>	(Cary Coutant's message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:55:39 -0700")
Message-ID: <mcrobyauc9t.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg01449.txt.bz2

Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com> writes:

>>> This patch is OK, with or without the testsuite additions Jakub
>>> mentions.
>>
>> Thanks, I added the new tests, and tweaked the clone suffix parsing to
>> allow the leading "_".
>>
>> Committed as r179132.
>
> Should I backport this patch to gcc-4_6-branch?

Since you offer, that would be nice.

Ian