* [PATCH] The inline keyword is supported in all new C standards
@ 2019-09-24 22:37 Palmer Dabbelt
2019-09-25 23:38 ` Joseph Myers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2019-09-24 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Palmer Dabbelt
The documentation used to indicate that the inline keyword was only
supported by c99 and c11, whereas in fact it is supported by c99 and all
newer standards.
gcc/ChangeLog
2019-09-24 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
* doc/extended.texi (Alternate Keywords): Change "-std=c11" to "a
later standard."
---
gcc/doc/extend.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index 64fccfe9b87..ef2fde3d989 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -10739,7 +10739,7 @@ a general-purpose header file that should be usable by all programs,
including ISO C programs. The keywords @code{asm}, @code{typeof} and
@code{inline} are not available in programs compiled with
@option{-ansi} or @option{-std} (although @code{inline} can be used in a
-program compiled with @option{-std=c99} or @option{-std=c11}). The
+program compiled with @option{-std=c99} or a later standard). The
ISO C99 keyword
@code{restrict} is only available when @option{-std=gnu99} (which will
eventually be the default) or @option{-std=c99} (or the equivalent
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] The inline keyword is supported in all new C standards
2019-09-24 22:37 [PATCH] The inline keyword is supported in all new C standards Palmer Dabbelt
@ 2019-09-25 23:38 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-12 19:16 ` Palmer Dabbelt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Myers @ 2019-09-25 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Palmer Dabbelt; +Cc: gcc-patches
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> The documentation used to indicate that the inline keyword was only
> supported by c99 and c11, whereas in fact it is supported by c99 and all
> newer standards.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
>
> 2019-09-24 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
>
> * doc/extended.texi (Alternate Keywords): Change "-std=c11" to "a
> later standard."
OK with the filename corrected in the ChangeLog entry.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] The inline keyword is supported in all new C standards
2019-09-25 23:38 ` Joseph Myers
@ 2019-10-12 19:16 ` Palmer Dabbelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2019-10-12 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: joseph; +Cc: gcc-patches
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:38:25 PDT (-0700), joseph@codesourcery.com wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
>> The documentation used to indicate that the inline keyword was only
>> supported by c99 and c11, whereas in fact it is supported by c99 and all
>> newer standards.
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog
>>
>> 2019-09-24 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
>>
>> * doc/extended.texi (Alternate Keywords): Change "-std=c11" to "a
>> later standard."
>
> OK with the filename corrected in the ChangeLog entry.
Committed (though I screwed up the changelog, sorry!)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-12 19:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-24 22:37 [PATCH] The inline keyword is supported in all new C standards Palmer Dabbelt
2019-09-25 23:38 ` Joseph Myers
2019-10-12 19:16 ` Palmer Dabbelt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).