From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF5D53858298 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 22:25:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BF5D53858298 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dabbelt.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dabbelt.com Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id b75so5390262pfb.7 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:25:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dabbelt-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:to:from:cc :in-reply-to:subject:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=pepZldx9wPLldN0cfBX57tS2kVIQjRILlNX5pp1dTS4=; b=3wt9+cuPXicWDom+Wd8xHE2Rg6WG8I8HOyYL4hbkZCvo876r7kZxjzd1SJrZanmpaM k6CUG5Xk3CdEzc3tCA6Vo215m14Iq8LmKDGqluKqZ5+on03d3IQO4MfcSJ5uSENOTvdL MPhssgVf8c+rTu0PpLySjL8amnpsLy5K4aWlnsqgXp1FqLqTbixKz8Annogq6QdoAHJU gp4eilBRp2nlJY8p7Osr1ZgpShjZGvLjZISqtig65VZUVlvGcDkqfjppDlvu9W07Zezh JDCNs/xwiamuEuqssEdJHY5ER9LTG64JShGoV5vXWXmaQkx3omOsw9E2OZ3sPWBEQstS naIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:to:from:cc :in-reply-to:subject:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=pepZldx9wPLldN0cfBX57tS2kVIQjRILlNX5pp1dTS4=; b=dWfCh+aCJwDXGaDX6irlbKADi7Pr/wCT3ZC9XG1eZNOJ4hEmIgW4BFC/U2caqLO890 pc1+/O5YOD9qAHrAkFoB0kc4Oal/iuXT10gpqIV1jcBMJ8PTNYgbCbvI2UV0OWV10ENb EYs9ahi0K2dxnEqFEhgo9mu3+TzVrlP6m87NKcgD/ddTTJJUFweOSXml5qp6qwu0EK1q R4rKI0IAoguFEsZWOPMzpLbpGBJAEOTUx1t+W8fZAaPuGK8NNCx36U+CtBnp6WW9PBqX 1vukzh30xq/tmsf0ofmafqELGvq2pYitkCog5kRxVs/C3FXPRw2x+cgNprVq0w4wT6/Y a5/w== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3z1R8OPpRGp7/os7xvQ1pKIbhUtWdaQMpnvGHSKLFFWE0Ghx6N HaX8Dho8WM0TfU0huE7Yp5zYqgdADfnqSYrf X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4oD1iUzgdE1JJwmVlzHt8naccPscwxgyewOzqfiDqMzlx8vl5EcbqGhCtXtivhO50oXL3xyw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:228c:b0:542:e65c:98 with SMTP id f12-20020a056a00228c00b00542e65c0098mr11173043pfe.79.1664576725260; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t14-20020a6549ce000000b0043c80e53c74sm2208322pgs.28.2022.09.30.15.25.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:25:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:24:52 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document -fexcess-precision=16 in tm.texi In-Reply-To: CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Palmer Dabbelt To: sandra@codesourcery.com Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,GIT_PATCH_0,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 19:13:36 PDT (-0700), sandra@codesourcery.com wrote: > On 9/18/22 02:47, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Sep 2022 02:46:40 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >>> I just happened to stuble on this one while trying to sort out the >>> RISC-V bits. >>> >>> gcc/ChangeLog >>> >>>     * doc/tm.texi (TARGET_C_EXCESS_PRECISION): Add 16. >>> --- >>>  gcc/doc/tm.texi | 2 +- >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/tm.texi b/gcc/doc/tm.texi >>> index 858bfb80cec..7590924f2ca 100644 >>> --- a/gcc/doc/tm.texi >>> +++ b/gcc/doc/tm.texi >>> @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ of the excess precision explicitly added.  For >>>  @code{EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE_FLOAT16}, and >>>  @code{EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE_FAST}, the target should return the >>>  explicit excess precision that should be added depending on the >>> -value set for @option{-fexcess-precision=@r{[}standard@r{|}fast@r{]}}. >>> +value set for >>> @option{-fexcess-precision=@r{[}standard@r{|}fast@r{|}16@r{]}}. >>>  Note that unpredictable explicit excess precision does not make sense, >>>  so a target should never return @code{FLT_EVAL_METHOD_UNPREDICTABLE} >>>  when @var{type} is @code{EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE_STANDARD}, >> >> Just pinging this one as I'm not sure if it's OK to self-approve -- no >> rush on my end, I already figured it out so I don't need the >> documentation any more. > > This is fine, looks like a trivial correction. Thanks, committed.