public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Robin Dapp <rdapp@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ifcvt: Check if cmovs are needed.
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:45:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mpt4k9kgflf.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b974902c-9cfe-b861-e3c8-cdbc950004ee@linux.ibm.com> (Robin Dapp's message of "Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:39:54 +0200")

Hi Robin,

Thanks for the update and sorry for the late response.

Robin Dapp <rdapp@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> Don't we still need this code (without the REG_DEAD handling) for the
>> case in which…
>> 
>>> +      /* As we are transforming
>>> +	 if (x > y)
>>> +	   {
>>> +	     a = b;
>>> +	     c = d;
>>> +	   }
>>> +	 into
>>> +	   a = (x > y) ...
>>> +	   c = (x > y) ...
>>> +
>>> +	 we potentially check x > y before every set.
>>> +	 Even though the check might be removed by subsequent passes, this means
>>> +	 that we cannot transform
>>> +	   if (x > y)
>>> +	     {
>>> +	       x = y;
>>> +	       ...
>>> +	     }
>>> +	 into
>>> +	   x = (x > y) ...
>>> +	   ...
>>> +	 since this would invalidate x and the following to-be-removed checks.
>>> +	 Therefore we introduce a temporary every time we are about to
>>> +	 overwrite a variable used in the check.  Costing of a sequence with
>>> +	 these is going to be inaccurate so only use temporaries when
>>> +	 needed.  */
>>> +      if (reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, cond))
>>> +	temp = gen_reg_rtx (GET_MODE (target));
>> 
>> …this code triggers?  I don't see otherwise how later uses of x would
>> pick up “temp” instead of the original target.  E.g. suppose we had:
>> 
>>      if (x > y)
>>        {
>>          x = …;
>>          z = x; // x does not die here
>>        }
>> 
>> Without the loop, it looks like z would pick up the old value of x
>> (used in the comparison) instead of the new one.
>
> getting back to this now.  I re-added handling of the situation you 
> mentioned (even though I didn't manage to trigger it myself).

Yeah, the only reliable way to test for this might be an rtx test
(see testsuite/gcc.dg/rtl for some examples).  A test isn't necessary
though.

My only remaining concern is that bb_ok_for_noce_convert_multiple_sets
allows subreg sources:

      if (!(REG_P (src)
	   || (GET_CODE (src) == SUBREG && REG_P (SUBREG_REG (src))
	       && subreg_lowpart_p (src))))
	return false;

These subregs could also require rewrites.  It looks like the original
code checks for overlaps correctly, but doesn't necessarily deal with
a hit correctly.  So this is at least partly pre-existing.

I think the way of handling that is as follows:

> diff --git a/gcc/ifcvt.c b/gcc/ifcvt.c
> index 017944f4f79..f1448667732 100644
> --- a/gcc/ifcvt.c
> +++ b/gcc/ifcvt.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static int dead_or_predicable (basic_block, basic_block, basic_block,
>  			       edge, int);
>  static void noce_emit_move_insn (rtx, rtx);
>  static rtx_insn *block_has_only_trap (basic_block);
> +static void need_cmov_or_rewire (basic_block, hash_set<rtx_insn *> *,
> +				 hash_map<rtx_insn *, int> *);
>  \f
>  /* Count the number of non-jump active insns in BB.  */
>  
> @@ -3203,6 +3205,11 @@ noce_convert_multiple_sets (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
>    auto_vec<rtx_insn *> unmodified_insns;
>    int count = 0;
>  
> +  hash_set<rtx_insn *> need_no_cmov;
> +  hash_map<rtx_insn *, int> rewired_src;
> +
> +  need_cmov_or_rewire (then_bb, &need_no_cmov, &rewired_src);
> +
>    FOR_BB_INSNS (then_bb, insn)
>      {
>        /* Skip over non-insns.  */
> @@ -3213,26 +3220,47 @@ noce_convert_multiple_sets (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
>        gcc_checking_assert (set);
>  
>        rtx target = SET_DEST (set);
> -      rtx temp = gen_reg_rtx (GET_MODE (target));
> -      rtx new_val = SET_SRC (set);
> +      rtx temp;
> +
> +      int *ii = rewired_src.get (insn);
> +      rtx new_val = ii == NULL ? SET_SRC (set) : temporaries[*ii];

(1) here use something like:

    rtx new_val = SET_SRC (set);
    if (int *ii = rewired_src.get (insn))
      new_val = simplify_replace_rtx (new_val, targets[*ii],
				      temporaries[*ii]);

>        rtx old_val = target;
>  
> -      /* If we were supposed to read from an earlier write in this block,
> -	 we've changed the register allocation.  Rewire the read.  While
> -	 we are looking, also try to catch a swap idiom.  */
> -      for (int i = count - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> -	if (reg_overlap_mentioned_p (new_val, targets[i]))
> -	  {
> -	    /* Catch a "swap" style idiom.  */
> -	    if (find_reg_note (insn, REG_DEAD, new_val) != NULL_RTX)
> -	      /* The write to targets[i] is only live until the read
> -		 here.  As the condition codes match, we can propagate
> -		 the set to here.  */
> -	      new_val = SET_SRC (single_set (unmodified_insns[i]));
> -	    else
> -	      new_val = temporaries[i];
> -	    break;
> -	  }
> +      /* As we are transforming
> +	 if (x > y)
> +	   {
> +	     a = b;
> +	     c = d;
> +	   }
> +	 into
> +	   a = (x > y) ...
> +	   c = (x > y) ...
> +
> +	 we potentially check x > y before every set.
> +	 Even though the check might be removed by subsequent passes, this means
> +	 that we cannot transform
> +	   if (x > y)
> +	     {
> +	       x = y;
> +	       ...
> +	     }
> +	 into
> +	   x = (x > y) ...
> +	   ...
> +	 since this would invalidate x and the following to-be-removed checks.
> +	 Therefore we introduce a temporary every time we are about to
> +	 overwrite a variable used in the check.  Costing of a sequence with
> +	 these is going to be inaccurate so only use temporaries when
> +	 needed.  */
> +      if (reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, cond))
> +	temp = gen_reg_rtx (GET_MODE (target));
> +      else
> +	temp = target;
> +
> +      /* We have identified swap-style idioms in check_need_cmovs.  A normal
> +	 set will need to be a cmov while the first instruction of a swap-style
> +	 idiom can be a regular move.  This helps with costing.  */
> +      bool need_cmov = !need_no_cmov.contains (insn);
>  
>        /* If we had a non-canonical conditional jump (i.e. one where
>  	 the fallthrough is to the "else" case) we need to reverse
> @@ -3275,16 +3303,29 @@ noce_convert_multiple_sets (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
>  	  old_val = lowpart_subreg (dst_mode, old_val, src_mode);
>  	}
>  
> -      /* Actually emit the conditional move.  */
> -      rtx temp_dest = noce_emit_cmove (if_info, temp, cond_code,
> -				       x, y, new_val, old_val);
> +      rtx temp_dest = NULL_RTX;
>  
> -      /* If we failed to expand the conditional move, drop out and don't
> -	 try to continue.  */
> -      if (temp_dest == NULL_RTX)
> +      if (need_cmov)
>  	{
> -	  end_sequence ();
> -	  return FALSE;
> +	  /* Actually emit the conditional move.  */
> +	  temp_dest = noce_emit_cmove (if_info, temp, cond_code,
> +					   x, y, new_val, old_val);
> +
> +	  /* If we failed to expand the conditional move, drop out and don't
> +	     try to continue.  */
> +	  if (temp_dest == NULL_RTX)
> +	    {
> +	      end_sequence ();
> +	      return FALSE;
> +	    }
> +	}
> +      else
> +	{
> +	  if (if_info->then_else_reversed)
> +	    noce_emit_move_insn (temp, old_val);
> +	  else
> +	    noce_emit_move_insn (temp, new_val);
> +	  temp_dest = temp;
>  	}
>  
>        /* Bookkeeping.  */
> @@ -3808,6 +3849,87 @@ check_cond_move_block (basic_block bb,
>    return TRUE;
>  }
>  
> +/* Find local swap-style idioms in BB and mark the first insn (1)
> +   that is only a temporary as not needing a conditional move as
> +   it is going to be dead afterwards anyway.
> +
> +     (1) int tmp = a;
> +	 a = b;
> +	 b = tmp;
> +
> +	 ifcvt
> +	 -->
> +
> +	 tmp = a;
> +	 a = cond ? b : a_old;
> +	 b = cond ? tmp : b_old;
> +
> +    Additionally, store the index of insns like (2) when a subsequent
> +    SET reads from their destination.
> +
> +    (2) int c = a;
> +	int d = c;
> +
> +	ifcvt
> +	-->
> +
> +	c = cond ? a : c_old;
> +	d = cond ? d : c;     // Need to use c rather than c_old here.
> +*/
> +
> +static void
> +need_cmov_or_rewire (basic_block bb,
> +		     hash_set<rtx_insn *> *need_no_cmov,
> +		     hash_map<rtx_insn *, int> *rewired_src)
> +{
> +  rtx_insn *insn;
> +  int count = 0;
> +  auto_vec<rtx_insn *> insns;
> +  auto_vec<rtx> dests;
> +
> +  /* Iterate over all SETs, storing the destinations
> +     in DEST.
> +     - If we hit a SET that reads from a destination
> +       that we have seen before and the corresponding register
> +       is dead afterwards, the register does not need to be
> +       moved conditionally.
> +     - If we encounter a previously changed register,
> +       rewire the read to the original source.  */
> +  FOR_BB_INSNS (bb, insn)
> +    {
> +      rtx set, src, dest;
> +
> +      if (!active_insn_p (insn))
> +	continue;
> +
> +      set = single_set (insn);
> +      if (set == NULL_RTX)
> +	continue;
> +
> +      src = SET_SRC (set);
> +      dest = SET_DEST (set);
> +
> +      /* Check if the current SET's source is the same
> +	 as any previously seen destination.
> +	 This is quadratic but the number of insns in BB
> +	 is bounded by PARAM_MAX_RTL_IF_CONVERSION_INSNS.  */

(2) Insert:

    if (SUBREG_P (src))
      src = SUBREG_REG (src);

here.

OK with those changes if that works.  Let me know if they don't —
I'll try to be quicker with the next review.

Thanks,
Richard

> +      if (REG_P (src))
> +	for (int i = count - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> +	  if (reg_overlap_mentioned_p (src, dests[i]))
> +	    {
> +	      if (find_reg_note (insn, REG_DEAD, src) != NULL_RTX)
> +		need_no_cmov->add (insns[i]);
> +	      else
> +		rewired_src->put (insn, i);
> +	    }
> +
> +      insns.safe_push (insn);
> +      dests.safe_push (dest);
> +
> +      count++;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  /* Given a basic block BB suitable for conditional move conversion,
>     a condition COND, and pointer maps THEN_VALS and ELSE_VALS containing
>     the register values depending on COND, emit the insns in the block as

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-14  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-25 16:08 [PATCH 0/7] ifcvt: Convert multiple Robin Dapp
2021-06-25 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] ifcvt: Check if cmovs are needed Robin Dapp
2021-07-15 20:10   ` Richard Sandiford
2021-07-22 12:06     ` Robin Dapp
2021-07-26 19:08       ` Richard Sandiford
2021-09-15  8:39         ` Robin Dapp
2021-10-14  8:45           ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2021-10-14 14:20             ` Robin Dapp
2021-10-14 14:32               ` Richard Sandiford
2021-10-18 11:40                 ` Robin Dapp
2021-11-03  8:55                   ` Robin Dapp
2021-11-05 15:33                   ` Richard Sandiford
2021-11-12 13:00                     ` Robin Dapp
2021-11-30 16:36                       ` Richard Sandiford
2021-06-25 16:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] ifcvt: Allow constants for noce_convert_multiple Robin Dapp
2021-07-15 20:25   ` Richard Sandiford
2021-06-25 16:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] ifcvt: Improve costs handling " Robin Dapp
2021-07-15 20:42   ` Richard Sandiford
2021-07-22 12:07     ` Robin Dapp
2021-07-26 19:10       ` Richard Sandiford
2021-06-25 16:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] ifcvt/optabs: Allow using a CC comparison for emit_conditional_move Robin Dapp
2021-07-15 20:54   ` Richard Sandiford
2021-07-22 12:07     ` Robin Dapp
2021-07-26 19:31       ` Richard Sandiford
2021-07-27 20:49         ` Robin Dapp
2021-08-06 12:14           ` Richard Sandiford
2021-06-25 16:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] ifcvt: Try re-using CC for conditional moves Robin Dapp
2021-07-22 12:12   ` Robin Dapp
2021-06-25 16:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] testsuite/s390: Add tests for noce_convert_multiple Robin Dapp
2021-06-25 16:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] s390: Increase costs for load on condition and change movqicc expander Robin Dapp
2021-07-13 12:42 ` [PATCH 0/7] ifcvt: Convert multiple Robin Dapp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mpt4k9kgflf.fsf@arm.com \
    --to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rdapp@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).