From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: "Pop\, Sebastian" <spop@amazon.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches\@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"sebpop\@gmail.com" <sebpop@gmail.com>,
Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Subject: Re: AArch64: Add UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA [PR98776]
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 11:34:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mpt7cz6gk33.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b2be13be3534681af5a64b8163a3c8c@amazon.com> (Sebastian Pop's message of "Thu, 1 Dec 2022 03:04:52 +0000")
"Pop, Sebastian" <spop@amazon.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Currently patchable area is at the wrong place on AArch64. It is placed
> immediately after function label, before .cfi_startproc. This patch
> adds UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for pseudo patchable area instruction and
> modifies aarch64_print_patchable_function_entry to avoid placing
> patchable area before .cfi_startproc.
>
> The patch passed bootstrap and regression test on aarch64-linux.
> Ok to commit to trunk and backport to active release branches?
Looks good, but doesn't the problem described in the PR then still
apply to the BTI emitted by:
if (cfun->machine->label_is_assembled
&& aarch64_bti_enabled ()
&& !cgraph_node::get (cfun->decl)->only_called_directly_p ())
{
/* Remove the BTI that follows the patch area and insert a new BTI
before the patch area right after the function label. */
rtx_insn *insn = next_real_nondebug_insn (get_insns ());
if (insn
&& INSN_P (insn)
&& GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == UNSPEC_VOLATILE
&& XINT (PATTERN (insn), 1) == UNSPECV_BTI_C)
delete_insn (insn);
asm_fprintf (file, "\thint\t34 // bti c\n");
}
? It seems like the BTI will be before the cfi_startproc and the
patchable entry afterwards.
I guess we should keep the BTI instruction as-is (rather than printing
a .hint) and emit the new UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA after the BTI rather
than before it.
Thanks,
Richard
> Thanks,
> Sebastian
>
> gcc/
> PR target/93492
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_output_patchable_area):
> Declared.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_print_patchable_function_entry):
> Emit an UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA pseudo instruction.
> (aarch64_output_patchable_area): New.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA): New.
> (patchable_area): Define.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR target/93492
> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr98776.c: New.
>
>
> From b9cf87bcdf65f515b38f1851eb95c18aaa180253 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sebastian Pop <spop@amazon.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:45:24 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] AArch64: Add UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA [PR98776]
>
> Currently patchable area is at the wrong place on AArch64. It is placed
> immediately after function label, before .cfi_startproc. This patch
> adds UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for pseudo patchable area instruction and
> modifies aarch64_print_patchable_function_entry to avoid placing
> patchable area before .cfi_startproc.
>
> gcc/
> PR target/93492
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_output_patchable_area):
> Declared.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_print_patchable_function_entry):
> Emit an UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA pseudo instruction.
> (aarch64_output_patchable_area): New.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA): New.
> (patchable_area): Define.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR target/93492
> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr98776.c: New.
> ---
> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h | 2 ++
> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md | 14 +++++++++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr98776.c | 11 ++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr98776.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
> index 4be93c93c26..2fba24d947d 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
> @@ -1074,4 +1074,6 @@ const char *aarch64_indirect_call_asm (rtx);
> extern bool aarch64_harden_sls_retbr_p (void);
> extern bool aarch64_harden_sls_blr_p (void);
>
> +extern void aarch64_output_patchable_area (unsigned int, bool);
> +
> #endif /* GCC_AARCH64_PROTOS_H */
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> index e97f3b32f7c..e84b33b958c 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> @@ -22684,7 +22684,29 @@ aarch64_print_patchable_function_entry (FILE *file,
> asm_fprintf (file, "\thint\t34 // bti c\n");
> }
>
> - default_print_patchable_function_entry (file, patch_area_size, record_p);
> + if (cfun->machine->label_is_assembled)
> + {
> + rtx pa = gen_patchable_area (GEN_INT (patch_area_size),
> + GEN_INT (record_p));
> + basic_block bb = ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun)->next_bb;
> + rtx_insn *insn = emit_insn_before (pa, BB_HEAD (bb));
> + INSN_ADDRESSES_NEW (insn, -1);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + default_print_patchable_function_entry (file, patch_area_size,
> + record_p);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* Output patchable area. */
> +
> +void
> +aarch64_output_patchable_area (unsigned int patch_area_size, bool record_p)
> +{
> + default_print_patchable_function_entry (asm_out_file,
> + patch_area_size,
> + record_p);
> }
>
> /* Implement ASM_OUTPUT_DEF_FROM_DECLS. Output .variant_pcs for aliases. */
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> index 76b6898ca04..6501503eb25 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@
> UNSPEC_TAG_SPACE ; Translate address to MTE tag address space.
> UNSPEC_LD1RO
> UNSPEC_SALT_ADDR
> + UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA
> ])
>
> (define_c_enum "unspecv" [
> @@ -7821,6 +7822,19 @@
> [(set_attr "type" "ls64")]
> )
>
> +(define_insn "patchable_area"
> + [(unspec_volatile [(match_operand 0 "const_int_operand")
> + (match_operand 1 "const_int_operand")]
> + UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA)]
> + ""
> +{
> + aarch64_output_patchable_area (INTVAL (operands[0]),
> + INTVAL (operands[1]) != 0);
> + return "";
> +}
> + [(set (attr "length") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[0])"))]
> +)
> +
> ;; AdvSIMD Stuff
> (include "aarch64-simd.md")
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr98776.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr98776.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..b075b8f75ef
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr98776.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* { dg-do "compile" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O1 -fpatchable-function-entry=1 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables" } */
> +
> +/* Test the placement of the .LPFE0 label. */
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\t\.cfi_startproc\n.*\.LPFE0:\n\tnop\n\tret\n" } } */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 3:04 Pop, Sebastian
2022-12-05 11:34 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2022-12-07 0:51 ` Pop, Sebastian
2022-12-07 9:12 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-07 18:46 ` Pop, Sebastian
2022-12-08 7:38 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-15 4:51 ` Pop, Sebastian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mpt7cz6gk33.fsf@arm.com \
--to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=sebpop@gmail.com \
--cc=spop@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).