public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] expr: Allow scalar_int_mode target mode when converting a constant
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:14:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mpt7dutq9sy.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722094855.dbpua4635rmncz2d@jozef-acer-manjaro> (Jozef Lawrynowicz's message of "Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:48:55 +0100")

Jozef Lawrynowicz <jozef.l@mittosystems.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:33:47AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Jozef Lawrynowicz <jozef.l@mittosystems.com> writes:
>> > is_int_mode does not allow MODE_PARTIAL_INT modes, so convert_modes was
>> > not allowing a constant value to be converted to a MODE_PARTIAL_INT for
>> > use as operand 2 in patterns such as ashlpsi3. The constant had
>> > to be copied into a register before it could be used, but now can be
>> > used directly as an operand without any copying.
>> 
>> Yeah.  I guess this dates back to when MODE_PARTIAL_INTs didn't have
>> a known precision.
>
> Is that what the section on MODE_PARTIAL_INT in the description for the
> "subreg" RTX refers to?  From "14.8 Registers and Memory" of gccint:
>
>   A MODE_PARTIAL_INT mode behaves as if it were as wide as the corresponding
>   MODE_INT mode, except that it has an unknown number of undefined bits.

Yeah.  Before d8487c949ad5 the number of significant bits in a partial
mode was hidden from target-independent code.

> If so, that whole section seems out of date. I can work on getting it
> fixed up.

Sounds good :-)

Thanks,
Richard

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-24 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-21 18:17 [PATCH 0/3] MSP430: Improve code-generation for shift instructions Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-07-21 18:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] expr: Allow scalar_int_mode target mode when converting a constant Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-07-22  8:33   ` Richard Sandiford
2020-07-22  9:48     ` Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-07-24 14:14       ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2020-07-21 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] expmed: Fix possible use of NULL_RTX return value from emit_store_flag Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-07-22  8:38   ` Richard Sandiford
2020-07-21 18:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] MSP430: Simplify and extend shift instruction patterns Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-08-07 10:55   ` ping " Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-08-25 19:16   ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mpt7dutq9sy.fsf@arm.com \
    --to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).