From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] match.pd: Some build_nonstandard_integer_type tweaks
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 17:50:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mptbkdyhzt8.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZQlSYHDjdxvK5LtD@tucnak> (Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches's message of "Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:48:48 +0200")
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed earlier, using build_nonstandard_integer_type blindly for all
> INTEGRAL_TYPE_Ps is problematic now that we have BITINT_TYPE, because it
> always creates an INTEGRAL_TYPE with some possibly very large precision.
> The following patch attempts to deal with 3 such spots in match.pd, others
> still need looking at.
>
> In the first case, I think it is quite expensive/undesirable to create
> a non-standard INTEGER_TYPE with possibly huge precision and then
> immediately just see type_has_mode_precision_p being false for it, or even
> worse introducing a cast to TImode or OImode or XImode INTEGER_TYPE which
> nothing will be able to actually handle. 128-bit or 64-bit (on 32-bit
> targets) types are the largest supported by the backend, so the following
> patch avoids creating and matching conversions to larger types, it is
> an optimization anyway and so should be used when it is cheap that way.
>
> In the second hunk, I believe the uses of build_nonstandard_integer_type
> aren't useful at all. It is when matching a ? -1 : 0 and trying to express
> it as say -(type) (bool) a etc., but this is all GIMPLE only, where most of
> integral types with same precision/signedness are compatible and we know
> -1 is representable in that type, so I really don't see any reason not to
> perform the negation of a [0, 1] valued expression in type, rather
> than doing it in
> build_nonstandard_integer_type (TYPE_PRECISION (type), TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
> (except that it breaks the BITINT_TYPEs). I don't think we need to do
> something like range_check_type.
> While in there, I've also noticed it was using a (with {
> tree booltrue = constant_boolean_node (true, boolean_type_node);
> } and removed that + replaced uses of booltrue with boolean_true_node
> which the above function always returns.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2023-09-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> * match.pd ((x << c) >> c): Don't call build_nonstandard_integer_type
> nor check type_has_mode_precision_p for width larger than [TD]Imode
> precision.
> (a ? CST1 : CST2): Don't use build_nonstandard_type, just convert
> to type. Use boolean_true_node instead of
> constant_boolean_node (true, boolean_type_node). Formatting fixes.
>
> --- gcc/match.pd.jj 2023-09-18 10:37:56.002965361 +0200
> +++ gcc/match.pd 2023-09-18 12:14:32.321631010 +0200
> @@ -4114,9 +4114,13 @@ (define_operator_list SYNC_FETCH_AND_AND
> (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
> (with {
> int width = element_precision (type) - tree_to_uhwi (@1);
> - tree stype = build_nonstandard_integer_type (width, 0);
> + tree stype = NULL_TREE;
> + scalar_int_mode mode = (targetm.scalar_mode_supported_p (TImode)
> + ? TImode : DImode);
> + if (width <= GET_MODE_PRECISION (mode))
> + stype = build_nonstandard_integer_type (width, 0);
How about using MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE for things like this?
Thanks,
Richard
> }
> - (if (width == 1 || type_has_mode_precision_p (stype))
> + (if (stype && (width == 1 || type_has_mode_precision_p (stype)))
> (convert (convert:stype @0))))))))
>
> /* Optimize x >> x into 0 */
> @@ -5092,49 +5096,24 @@ (define_operator_list SYNC_FETCH_AND_AND
> /* a ? -1 : 0 -> -a. No need to check the TYPE_PRECISION not being 1
> here as the powerof2cst case above will handle that case correctly. */
> (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && integer_all_onesp (@1))
> + (negate (convert:type (convert:boolean_type_node @0))))))
> + (if (integer_zerop (@1))
> + (switch
> + /* a ? 0 : 1 -> !a. */
> + (if (integer_onep (@2))
> + (convert (bit_xor (convert:boolean_type_node @0) { boolean_true_node; })))
> + /* a ? powerof2cst : 0 -> (!a) << (log2(powerof2cst)) */
> + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && integer_pow2p (@2))
> (with {
> - auto prec = TYPE_PRECISION (type);
> - auto unsign = TYPE_UNSIGNED (type);
> - tree inttype = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, unsign);
> + tree shift = build_int_cst (integer_type_node, tree_log2 (@2));
> }
> - (convert (negate (convert:inttype (convert:boolean_type_node @0))))))))
> - (if (integer_zerop (@1))
> - (with {
> - tree booltrue = constant_boolean_node (true, boolean_type_node);
> - }
> - (switch
> - /* a ? 0 : 1 -> !a. */
> - (if (integer_onep (@2))
> - (convert (bit_xor (convert:boolean_type_node @0) { booltrue; } )))
> - /* a ? powerof2cst : 0 -> (!a) << (log2(powerof2cst)) */
> - (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && integer_pow2p (@2))
> - (with {
> - tree shift = build_int_cst (integer_type_node, tree_log2 (@2));
> - }
> - (lshift (convert (bit_xor (convert:boolean_type_node @0) { booltrue; } ))
> - { shift; })))
> - /* a ? -1 : 0 -> -(!a). No need to check the TYPE_PRECISION not being 1
> + (lshift (convert (bit_xor (convert:boolean_type_node @0)
> + { boolean_true_node; })) { shift; })))
> + /* a ? -1 : 0 -> -(!a). No need to check the TYPE_PRECISION not being 1
> here as the powerof2cst case above will handle that case correctly. */
> - (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && integer_all_onesp (@2))
> - (with {
> - auto prec = TYPE_PRECISION (type);
> - auto unsign = TYPE_UNSIGNED (type);
> - tree inttype = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, unsign);
> - }
> - (convert
> - (negate
> - (convert:inttype
> - (bit_xor (convert:boolean_type_node @0) { booltrue; } )
> - )
> - )
> - )
> - )
> - )
> - )
> - )
> - )
> - )
> -)
> + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && integer_all_onesp (@2))
> + (negate (convert:type (bit_xor (convert:boolean_type_node @0)
> + { boolean_true_node; }))))))))
>
> /* (a > 1) ? 0 : (cast)a is the same as (cast)(a == 1)
> for unsigned types. */
>
> Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 7:48 Jakub Jelinek
2023-09-19 8:40 ` Richard Biener
2023-09-19 16:50 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2023-09-20 7:23 ` [PATCH] middle-end: use MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE instead of precidion of TImode/DImode Jakub Jelinek
2023-09-20 7:43 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mptbkdyhzt8.fsf@arm.com \
--to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=apinski@marvell.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).