From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A323858D20 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:26:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D9A323858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C62D75; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 06:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (e121540-lin.manchester.arm.com [10.32.110.72]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF7383F64C; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 06:26:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Sandiford To: Jakub Jelinek Mail-Followup-To: Jakub Jelinek ,"Andre Vieira \(lists\)" , "gcc-patches\@gcc.gnu.org" , Kyrylo Tkachov , richard.sandiford@arm.com Cc: "Andre Vieira \(lists\)" , "gcc-patches\@gcc.gnu.org" , Kyrylo Tkachov Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: enable mixed-types for aarch64 simdclones References: <9322d3d7-5188-fd49-7902-74efa5d65da7@arm.com> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:26:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jakub Jelinek's message of "Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:53:49 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_NONE,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Jakub Jelinek writes: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 06:27:20PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Jakub Jelinek writes: >> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> >> Jakub: do you remember what the reason was? I don't mind dropping >> >> "function", but it feels weird to drop the quotes around "simd". >> >> Seems like, if we do that, there'll one day be a patch to add >> >> them back. :) >> > >> > Because in OpenMP their are % functions, not % >> > %functions, but we also have the %/% attribute as >> > extension. >> >> Yeah, I can understand dropping the "function" bit. But why >> s/unsupported ... for %/unsupported ... for simd/? >> Even if it's only a partial syntax quote, it is still a syntax quote. > > % in OpenMP is something very different though, so I think it is > better to use it as a generic term which covers the different syntax cases. OK, I won't press it further. Richard