From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D444D3857001 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:57:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D444D3857001 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E2315BF; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 05:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (e121540-lin.manchester.arm.com [10.32.98.37]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDFDE3F73B; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 05:57:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Sandiford To: Dimitrije Milosevic Mail-Followup-To: Dimitrije Milosevic , Xi Ruoyao , "gcc-patches\@gcc.gnu.org" , Djordje Todorovic , richard.sandiford@arm.com Cc: Xi Ruoyao , "gcc-patches\@gcc.gnu.org" , Djordje Todorovic Subject: Re: PING: [PATCH] libsanitizer: Cherry-pick 2bfb0fcb51510f22723c8cdfefe from upstream References: <095ec95f5c9dca9dc298db988ba50f18a9dfdbbf.camel@xry111.site> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:57:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dimitrije Milosevic's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2022 06:52:26 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-47.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:57:42 -0000 Dimitrije Milosevic writes: >> Do you know someone very familiar with MIPS and GCC and capable as a >> port maintainer? An active MIPS port maintainer will make the situation >> better. > Sadly, no. I agree it would make things easier. Yeah, I agree that's what we need. I stepped down from being a MIPS maintainer over eight years ago and Matthew moved on to other things several years ago as well. The port has been unmaintained for a long time now. For a while I tried to be practical and approve trivial patches, even though working for an IP company makes that somewhat awkward from a conflict-of-interest perspective. But it's been so long now since I worked on MIPS that the technical side is becoming a problem too. Thanks, Richard