public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, nd@arm.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com,
	Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com, Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5]AArch64 sve: combine nested if predicates
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:15:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mpto899ewqd.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patch-14777-tamar@arm.com> (Tamar Christina's message of "Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:31:56 +0100")

Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com> writes:
> Hi All,
>
> The following example
>
> void f5(float * restrict z0, float * restrict z1, float *restrict x,
> 	float * restrict y, float c, int n)
> {
>     for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
>         float a = x[i];
>         float b = y[i];
>         if (a > b) {
>             z0[i] = a + b;
>             if (a > c) {
>                 z1[i] = a - b;
>             }
>         }
>     }
> }
>
> generates currently:
>
>         ptrue   p3.b, all
>         ld1w    z1.s, p1/z, [x2, x5, lsl 2]
>         ld1w    z2.s, p1/z, [x3, x5, lsl 2]
>         fcmgt   p0.s, p3/z, z1.s, z0.s
>         fcmgt   p2.s, p1/z, z1.s, z2.s
>         fcmgt   p0.s, p0/z, z1.s, z2.s
>
> The conditions for a > b and a > c become separate comparisons.
>
> After this patch using a 2 -> 2 split we generate:
>
>         ld1w    z1.s, p0/z, [x2, x5, lsl 2]
>         ld1w    z2.s, p0/z, [x3, x5, lsl 2]
>         fcmgt   p1.s, p0/z, z1.s, z2.s
>         fcmgt   p1.s, p1/z, z1.s, z0.s
>
> Where the condition a > b && a > c are folded by using the predicate result of
> the previous compare and thus allows the removal of one of the compares.
>
> Note: This patch series is working incrementally towards generating the most
>       efficient code for this and other loops in small steps.

It looks like this could be done in the vectoriser via an extension
of the scalar_cond_masked_set mechanism.  We have:

  mask__54.13_59 = vect_a_15.9_55 > vect_b_17.12_58;
  vec_mask_and_60 = loop_mask_32 & mask__54.13_59;
  …
  mask__30.17_67 = vect_a_15.9_55 > vect_cst__66;
  mask__29.18_68 = mask__54.13_59 & mask__30.17_67;
  vec_mask_and_69 = loop_mask_32 & mask__29.18_68;

When vectorising mask__29.18_68, we could test whether each side
of the "&" is already in scalar_cond_masked_set and AND in the loop
mask if so, like we do in vectorizable_condition.  We could then
separately record that the & result includes the loop mask.

Thanks,
Richard

> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
>
> Ok for master?
>
> Thanks,
> Tamar
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md (*mask_cmp_and_combine): New.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pred-combine-and.c: New test.
>
> --- inline copy of patch -- 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md
> index 2c23c6b12bafb038d82920e7141a418e078a2c65..ee9d32c0a5534209689d9d3abaa560ee5b66347d 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md
> @@ -8162,6 +8162,48 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*mask_inv_combine"
>  }
>  )
>  
> +;; Combine multiple masks where the comparisons operators are the same and
> +;; each comparison has one parameter shared. e.g. combine a > b && a > c
> +(define_insn_and_split "*mask_cmp_and_combine"
> +  [(set (match_operand:<VPRED> 0 "register_operand" "=Upa")
> +	(and:<VPRED>
> +	  (and:<VPRED>
> +	    (unspec:<VPRED>
> +	      [(match_operand:<VPRED> 1)
> +	       (const_int SVE_KNOWN_PTRUE)
> +	       (match_operand:SVE_FULL_F 2 "register_operand" "w")
> +	       (match_operand:SVE_FULL_F 3 "aarch64_simd_reg_or_zero" "wDz")]
> +	      SVE_COND_FP_CMP_I0)
> +	    (unspec:<VPRED>
> +	      [(match_dup 1)
> +	       (const_int SVE_KNOWN_PTRUE)
> +	       (match_dup 2)
> +	       (match_operand:SVE_FULL_F 4 "aarch64_simd_reg_or_zero" "wDz")]
> +	      SVE_COND_FP_CMP_I0))
> +	    (match_operand:<VPRED> 5 "register_operand" "Upa")))
> +   (clobber (match_scratch:<VPRED> 6 "=&Upa"))]
> +  "TARGET_SVE"
> +  "#"
> +  "&& 1"
> +  [(set (match_dup 6)
> +	(unspec:<VPRED>
> +	  [(match_dup 5)
> +	   (const_int SVE_MAYBE_NOT_PTRUE)
> +	   (match_dup 2)
> +	   (match_dup 3)]
> +	  SVE_COND_FP_CMP_I0))
> +   (set (match_dup 0)
> +	(unspec:<VPRED>
> +	  [(match_dup 6)
> +	   (const_int SVE_MAYBE_NOT_PTRUE)
> +	   (match_dup 2)
> +	   (match_dup 4)]
> +	  SVE_COND_FP_CMP_I0))]
> +{
> +  operands[6] = gen_reg_rtx (<VPRED>mode);
> +}
> +)
> +
>  ;; -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  ;; ---- [FP] Absolute comparisons
>  ;; -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pred-combine-and.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pred-combine-and.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d395b7f84bb15b588493611df5a47549726ac24a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pred-combine-and.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* { dg-do assemble { target aarch64_asm_sve_ok } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O3 --save-temps" } */
> +
> +void f5(float * restrict z0, float * restrict z1, float *restrict x, float * restrict y, float c, int n)
> +{
> +    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +        float a = x[i];
> +        float b = y[i];
> +        if (a > b) {
> +            z0[i] = a + b;
> +            if (a > c) {
> +                z1[i] = a - b;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tfcmgt\tp[0-9]+\.s, p[0-9]+/z, z[0-9]+\.s, z[0-9]+\.s} 2 } } */

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-03 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-31 13:31 Tamar Christina
2021-09-03 11:15 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2021-09-21 16:54   ` Tamar Christina
2021-10-11 16:40     ` Richard Sandiford
2021-11-02 13:49       ` Tamar Christina
2021-11-02 15:04         ` Richard Sandiford
2021-11-15 10:47           ` Tamar Christina
2021-11-30 16:24             ` Richard Sandiford
2021-12-02 21:33               ` Tamar Christina
2021-12-03 11:55                 ` Richard Sandiford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mpto899ewqd.fsf@arm.com \
    --to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=tamar.christina@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).