From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Alex Coplan <alex.coplan@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>,
Richard Earnshaw <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] aarch64: Fix up debug uses in ldp/stp pass [PR113089]
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:09:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mptsf2pmh1l.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zao7aw8tRtUEPtnO@arm.com> (Alex Coplan's message of "Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:05:47 +0000")
Sorry for the earlier review comment about debug insns. I hadn't
looked far enough into the queue to see this patch.
Alex Coplan <alex.coplan@arm.com> writes:
> As the PR shows, we were missing code to update debug uses in the
> load/store pair fusion pass. This patch fixes that.
>
> Note that this patch depends on the following patch to create new uses
> in RTL-SSA, submitted as part of the fixes for PR113070:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/642919.html
>
> The patch tries to give a complete treatment of the debug uses that will
> be affected by the changes we make, and in particular makes an effort to
> preserve debug info where possible, e.g. when re-ordering an update of
> a base register by a constant over a debug use of that register. When
> re-ordering loads over a debug use of a transfer register, we reset the
> debug insn. Likewise when re-ordering stores over debug uses of mem.
>
> While doing this I noticed that try_promote_writeback used a strange
> choice of move_range for the pair insn, in that it chose the previous
> nondebug insn instead of the insn itself. Since the insn is being
> changed, these move ranges are equivalent (at least in terms of nondebug
> insn placement as far as RTL-SSA is concerned), but I think it is more
> natural to choose the pair insn itself. This is needed to avoid
> incorrectly updating some debug uses.
>
> Notes on testing:
> - The series was bootstrapped/regtested on top of the fixes for
> PR113070 and PR113356. It seemed to make more sense to test with
> correct use/def info, and as mentioned above, this patch depends on
> one of the PR113070 patches.
> - I also ran the testsuite with -g -funroll-loops -mearly-ldp-fusion
> -mlate-ldp-fusion to try and flush out more issues, and worked
> through some examples where writeback updates were triggered to
> make sure it was doing the right thing.
> - The patches also survived an LTO+PGO bootstrap with
> --enable-languages=all (with the passes enabled).
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested as a series on aarch64-linux-gnu (with/without
> the pass enabled). OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/113089
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc (reset_debug_use): New.
> (fixup_debug_use): New.
> (fixup_debug_uses_trailing_add): New.
> (fixup_debug_uses): New. Use it ...
> (ldp_bb_info::fuse_pair): ... here.
> (try_promote_writeback): Call fixup_debug_uses_trailing_add to
> fix up debug uses of the base register that are affected by
> folding in the trailing add insn.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/113089
> * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr113089.c: New test.
> ---
> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc | 332 +++++++++++++++++-
> .../gcc.c-torture/compile/pr113089.c | 26 ++
> 2 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr113089.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc
> index 4d7fd72c6b1..fd0278e7acf 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc
> @@ -1342,6 +1342,309 @@ ldp_bb_info::track_tombstone (int uid)
> gcc_unreachable (); // Bit should have changed.
> }
>
> +// Reset the debug insn containing USE (the debug insn has been
> +// optimized away).
> +static void
> +reset_debug_use (use_info *use)
> +{
> + auto use_insn = use->insn ();
> + auto use_rtl = use_insn->rtl ();
> + insn_change change (use_insn);
> + change.new_uses = {};
> + INSN_VAR_LOCATION_LOC (use_rtl) = gen_rtx_UNKNOWN_VAR_LOC ();
> + crtl->ssa->change_insn (change);
> +}
> +
> +// USE is a debug use that needs updating because DEF (a def of the same
> +// register) is being re-ordered over it. If BASE is non-null, then DEF
> +// is an update of the register BASE by a constant, given by WB_OFFSET,
> +// and we can preserve debug info by accounting for the change in side
> +// effects.
> +static void
> +fixup_debug_use (obstack_watermark &attempt,
> + use_info *use,
> + def_info *def,
> + rtx base,
> + poly_int64 wb_offset)
> +{
> + auto use_insn = use->insn ();
> + if (base)
> + {
> + auto use_rtl = use_insn->rtl ();
> + insn_change change (use_insn);
> +
> + gcc_checking_assert (REG_P (base) && use->regno () == REGNO (base));
> + change.new_uses = check_remove_regno_access (attempt,
> + change.new_uses,
> + use->regno ());
> +
> + // The effect of the writeback is to add WB_OFFSET to BASE. If
> + // we're re-ordering DEF below USE, then we update USE by adding
> + // WB_OFFSET to it. Otherwise, if we're re-ordering DEF above
> + // USE, we update USE by undoing the effect of the writeback
> + // (subtracting WB_OFFSET).
> + use_info *new_use;
> + if (*def->insn () > *use_insn)
> + {
> + // We now need USE_INSN to consume DEF. Create a new use of DEF.
> + //
> + // N.B. this means until we call change_insns for the main change
> + // group we will temporarily have a debug use consuming a def that
> + // comes after it, but RTL-SSA doesn't currently support updating
> + // debug insns as part of the main change group (together with
> + // nondebug changes), so we will have to live with this update
> + // leaving the IR being temporarily inconsistent. It seems to
> + // work out OK once the main change group is applied.
> + wb_offset *= -1;
> + new_use = crtl->ssa->create_use (attempt,
> + use_insn,
> + as_a<set_info *> (def));
> + }
> + else
> + new_use = find_access (def->insn ()->uses (), use->regno ());
> +
> + change.new_uses = insert_access (attempt, new_use, change.new_uses);
> +
> + if (dump_file)
> + {
> + const char *dir = (*def->insn () < *use_insn) ? "down" : "up";
> + pretty_printer pp;
> + pp_string (&pp, "[");
> + pp_access (&pp, use, 0);
> + pp_string (&pp, "]");
> + pp_string (&pp, " due to wb def ");
> + pp_string (&pp, "[");
> + pp_access (&pp, def, 0);
> + pp_string (&pp, "]");
> + fprintf (dump_file,
> + " i%d: fix up debug use %s re-ordered %s, "
> + "sub r%u -> r%u + ",
> + use_insn->uid (), pp_formatted_text (&pp),
> + dir, REGNO (base), REGNO (base));
> + print_dec (wb_offset, dump_file);
> + fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
> + }
> +
> + insn_propagation prop (use_rtl, base,
> + plus_constant (GET_MODE (base), base, wb_offset));
> + if (prop.apply_to_pattern (&INSN_VAR_LOCATION_LOC (use_rtl)))
> + crtl->ssa->change_insn (change);
> + else
> + {
> + if (dump_file)
> + fprintf (dump_file, " i%d: RTL substitution failed (%s)"
> + ", resetting debug insn", use_insn->uid (),
> + prop.failure_reason);
> + reset_debug_use (use);
> + }
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + if (dump_file)
> + {
> + pretty_printer pp;
> + pp_string (&pp, "[");
> + pp_access (&pp, use, 0);
> + pp_string (&pp, "] due to re-ordered load def [");
> + pp_access (&pp, def, 0);
> + pp_string (&pp, "]");
> + fprintf (dump_file, " i%d: resetting debug use %s\n",
> + use_insn->uid (), pp_formatted_text (&pp));
> + }
> + reset_debug_use (use);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +// Update debug uses when folding in a trailing add insn to form a
> +// writeback pair.
> +//
> +// ATTEMPT is used to allocate RTL-SSA temporaries for the changes,
> +// the final pair is placed immediately after PAIR_DST, TRAILING_ADD
> +// is a trailing add insn which is being folded into the pair to make it
> +// use writeback addressing, and WRITEBACK_EFFECT is the pattern for
> +// TRAILING_ADD.
> +static void
> +fixup_debug_uses_trailing_add (obstack_watermark &attempt,
> + insn_info *pair_dst,
> + insn_info *trailing_add,
> + rtx writeback_effect)
> +{
> + rtx base = SET_DEST (writeback_effect);
> +
> + poly_int64 wb_offset;
> + rtx base2 = strip_offset (SET_SRC (writeback_effect), &wb_offset);
> + gcc_checking_assert (rtx_equal_p (base, base2));
> +
> + auto defs = trailing_add->defs ();
> + gcc_checking_assert (defs.size () == 1);
> + def_info *def = defs[0];
> +
> + if (auto set = safe_dyn_cast<set_info *> (def->prev_def ()))
> + for (auto use : set->debug_insn_uses ())
> + if (*use->insn () > *pair_dst)
> + // DEF is getting re-ordered above USE, fix up USE accordingly.
> + fixup_debug_use (attempt, use, def, base, wb_offset);
> +}
> +
> +// Called from fuse_pair, fixes up any debug uses that will be affected
> +// by the changes.
> +//
> +// ATTEMPT is the obstack watermark used to allocate RTL-SSA temporaries for
> +// the changes, INSNS gives the candidate insns: at this point the use/def
> +// information should still be as on entry to fuse_pair, but the patterns may
> +// have changed, hence we pass ORIG_RTL which contains the original patterns
> +// for the candidate insns.
> +//
> +// The final pair will be placed immediately after PAIR_DST, LOAD_P is true if
> +// it is a load pair, bit I of WRITEBACK is set if INSNS[I] originally had
> +// writeback, and WRITEBACK_EFFECT is an rtx describing the overall update to
> +// the base register in the final pair (if any). BASE_REGNO gives the register
> +// number of the base register used in the final pair.
> +static void
> +fixup_debug_uses (obstack_watermark &attempt,
> + insn_info *insns[2],
> + rtx orig_rtl[2],
> + insn_info *pair_dst,
> + insn_info *trailing_add,
> + bool load_p,
> + int writeback,
> + rtx writeback_effect,
> + unsigned base_regno)
> +{
> + // USE is a debug use that needs updating because DEF (a def of the
> + // resource) is being re-ordered over it. If WRITEBACK_PAT is non-NULL,
> + // then it gives the original RTL pattern for DEF's insn, and DEF is a
> + // writeback update of the base register.
> + //
> + // This simply unpacks WRITEBACK_PAT if needed and calls fixup_debug_use.
> + auto update_debug_use = [&](use_info *use, def_info *def,
> + rtx writeback_pat)
> + {
> + poly_int64 offset = 0;
> + rtx base = NULL_RTX;
> + if (writeback_pat)
> + {
> + rtx mem = XEXP (writeback_pat, load_p);
> + gcc_checking_assert (GET_RTX_CLASS (GET_CODE (XEXP (mem, 0)))
> + == RTX_AUTOINC);
> +
> + base = ldp_strip_offset (mem, &offset);
> + gcc_checking_assert (REG_P (base) && REGNO (base) == base_regno);
> + }
> + fixup_debug_use (attempt, use, def, base, offset);
> + };
> +
> + // Reset any debug uses of mem over which we re-ordered a store.
> + //
> + // It would be nice to try and preserve debug info here, but it seems that
> + // would require doing alias analysis to see if the store aliases with the
> + // debug use, which seems a little extravagant just to preserve debug info.
> + if (!load_p)
> + {
> + auto def = memory_access (insns[0]->defs ());
> + auto last_def = memory_access (insns[1]->defs ());
> + for (; def != last_def; def = def->next_def ())
> + if (auto set = dyn_cast<set_info *> (def))
Similarly to the review of the other patch, I think we should use
an unconditional as_a here.
> + for (auto use : set->debug_insn_uses ())
> + {
> + if (dump_file)
> + fprintf (dump_file, " i%d: resetting debug use of mem\n",
> + use->insn ()->uid ());
> + reset_debug_use (use);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + // Now let's take care of register uses, starting with debug uses
> + // attached to defs from our first insn.
> + for (auto def : insns[0]->defs ())
> + {
> + auto set = dyn_cast<set_info *> (def);
> + if (!set || set->is_mem () || !set->first_debug_insn_use ())
> + continue;
> +
> + def_info *defs[2] = {
> + def,
> + find_access (insns[1]->defs (), def->regno ())
> + };
> +
> + rtx writeback_pats[2] = {};
> + if (def->regno () == base_regno)
> + for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> + if (defs[i] && (writeback & (1 << i)))
Are both checks needed? If so, what does it mean for the writeback
bit to be set but defs[i] to be null? Could we assert the defs[i]
part instead?
> + writeback_pats[i] = orig_rtl[i];
> +
> + // Now that we've characterized the defs involved, go through the
> + // debug uses and determine how to update them (if needed).
> + for (auto use : set->debug_insn_uses ())
> + {
> + if (*pair_dst < *use->insn () && defs[1])
> + // We're re-ordering defs[1] above a previous use of the
> + // same resource.
> + update_debug_use (use, defs[1], writeback_pats[1]);
> + else if (*pair_dst >= *use->insn ())
> + // We're re-ordering defs[0] below its use.
> + update_debug_use (use, defs[0], writeback_pats[0]);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + // Now let's look at registers which are def'd by the second insn
> + // but not by the first insn, there may still be debug uses of a
> + // previous def which can be affected by moving the second insn up.
> + for (auto def : insns[1]->defs ())
> + {
> + // This should be M log N where N is the number of defs in
> + // insns[0] and M is the number of defs in insns[1].
> + if (def->is_mem () || find_access (insns[0]->defs (), def->regno ()))
> + continue;
> +
> + auto prev_set = safe_dyn_cast<set_info *> (def->prev_def ());
> + if (!prev_set)
> + continue;
> +
> + rtx writeback_pat = NULL_RTX;
> + if (def->regno () == base_regno && (writeback & 2))
> + writeback_pat = orig_rtl[1];
> +
> + // We have a def in insns[1] which isn't def'd by the first insn.
> + // Look to the previous def and see if it has any debug uses.
> + for (auto use : prev_set->debug_insn_uses ())
> + if (*pair_dst < *use->insn ())
> + // We're ordering DEF above a previous use of the same register.
> + update_debug_use (use, def, writeback_pat);
This might be more efficient as a reverse walk that breaks as soon as
*pair_dst >= *use->insn (), since the previous def could be arbitrarily
far away and have arbitrarily many leading uses. But it probably doesn't
matter much in practice.
> + }
> +
> + if ((writeback & 2) && !writeback_effect)
> + {
> + // If the second insn initially had writeback but the final
> + // pair does not, then there may be trailing debug uses of the
> + // second writeback def which need re-parenting: do that.
> + auto def = find_access (insns[1]->defs (), base_regno);
> + gcc_assert (def);
> + for (auto use : as_a<set_info *> (def)->debug_insn_uses ())
> + {
> + insn_change change (use->insn ());
> + change.new_uses = check_remove_regno_access (attempt,
> + change.new_uses,
> + base_regno);
> + auto new_use = find_access (insns[0]->uses (), base_regno);
> +
> + // N.B. insns must have already shared a common base due to writeback.
> + gcc_assert (new_use);
> +
> + if (dump_file)
> + fprintf (dump_file,
> + " i%d: cancelling wb, re-parenting trailing debug use\n",
> + use->insn ()->uid ());
> +
> + change.new_uses = insert_access (attempt, new_use, change.new_uses);
> + crtl->ssa->change_insn (change);
> + }
> + }
> + else if (trailing_add)
> + fixup_debug_uses_trailing_add (attempt, pair_dst, trailing_add,
> + writeback_effect);
> +}
> +
> // Try and actually fuse the pair given by insns I1 and I2.
> //
> // Here we've done enough analysis to know this is safe, we only
> @@ -1378,6 +1681,9 @@ ldp_bb_info::fuse_pair (bool load_p,
> insn_info *first = (*i1 < *i2) ? i1 : i2;
> insn_info *second = (first == i1) ? i2 : i1;
>
> + insn_info *pair_dst = move_range.singleton ();
> + gcc_assert (pair_dst);
> +
> insn_info *insns[2] = { first, second };
>
> auto_vec<insn_change *> changes;
> @@ -1388,6 +1694,13 @@ ldp_bb_info::fuse_pair (bool load_p,
> PATTERN (second->rtl ())
> };
>
> + // Make copies of the patterns as we might need to refer to the original RTL
> + // later, for example when updating debug uses (which is after we've updated
> + // one or both of the patterns in the candidate insns).
> + rtx orig_rtl[2];
> + for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> + orig_rtl[i] = copy_rtx (pats[i]);
> +
FWIW, an alternative (that avoids RTL allocation) would be to use
temporarily_undo_changes and redo_changes. But this is fine too.
The patch is OK from my POV with the as_a change above, but I'd be
interested in the answer to the writeback question above.
Thanks,
Richard
> use_array input_uses[2] = { first->uses (), second->uses () };
> def_array input_defs[2] = { first->defs (), second->defs () };
>
> @@ -1604,9 +1917,7 @@ ldp_bb_info::fuse_pair (bool load_p,
> using Action = stp_change_builder::action;
> insn_info *store_to_change = try_repurpose_store (first, second,
> move_range);
> - insn_info *stp_dest = move_range.singleton ();
> - gcc_assert (stp_dest);
> - stp_change_builder builder (insns, store_to_change, stp_dest);
> + stp_change_builder builder (insns, store_to_change, pair_dst);
> insn_change *change;
> set_info *new_set = nullptr;
> for (; !builder.done (); builder.advance ())
> @@ -1677,7 +1988,7 @@ ldp_bb_info::fuse_pair (bool load_p,
> fprintf (dump_file,
> " stp: changing i%d to use mem from new stp "
> "(after i%d)\n",
> - action.insn->uid (), stp_dest->uid ());
> + action.insn->uid (), pair_dst->uid ());
> change->new_uses = drop_memory_access (change->new_uses);
> gcc_assert (new_set);
> auto new_use = crtl->ssa->create_use (attempt, action.insn,
> @@ -1741,6 +2052,11 @@ ldp_bb_info::fuse_pair (bool load_p,
>
> gcc_assert (crtl->ssa->verify_insn_changes (changes));
>
> + // Fix up any debug uses that will be affected by the changes.
> + if (MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_INSNS)
> + fixup_debug_uses (attempt, insns, orig_rtl, pair_dst, trailing_add,
> + load_p, writeback, writeback_effect, base_regno);
> +
> confirm_change_group ();
> crtl->ssa->change_insns (changes);
>
> @@ -2807,7 +3123,7 @@ try_promote_writeback (insn_info *insn)
>
> rtx wb_effect = NULL_RTX;
> def_info *add_def;
> - const insn_range_info pair_range (insn->prev_nondebug_insn ());
> + const insn_range_info pair_range (insn);
> insn_info *insns[2] = { nullptr, insn };
> insn_info *trailing_add = find_trailing_add (insns, pair_range, 0, &wb_effect,
> &add_def, base_def, offset,
> @@ -2830,14 +3146,16 @@ try_promote_writeback (insn_info *insn)
> pair_change.new_defs);
> gcc_assert (pair_change.new_defs.is_valid ());
>
> - pair_change.move_range = insn_range_info (insn->prev_nondebug_insn ());
> -
> auto is_changing = insn_is_changing (changes);
> for (unsigned i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (changes); i++)
> gcc_assert (rtl_ssa::restrict_movement_ignoring (*changes[i], is_changing));
>
> gcc_assert (rtl_ssa::recog_ignoring (attempt, pair_change, is_changing));
> gcc_assert (crtl->ssa->verify_insn_changes (changes));
> +
> + if (MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_INSNS)
> + fixup_debug_uses_trailing_add (attempt, insn, trailing_add, wb_effect);
> +
> confirm_change_group ();
> crtl->ssa->change_insns (changes);
> }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr113089.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr113089.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..70c71f23f1c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr113089.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-g -funroll-loops" } */
> +
> +typedef unsigned short uint16;
> +
> +void intrapred_chroma_plane(uint16 ***mb_preds, int* max_imgpel_values, int crx, int cry, int px) {
> + for (int uv = 0; uv < 2; uv++) {
> + uint16 **mb_pred = mb_preds[uv + 1];
> + uint16 **predU2 = &mb_pred[px - 2];
> + uint16 *upPred = &mb_pred[px][px];
> + int max_imgpel_value = max_imgpel_values[uv];
> +
> + int ih = upPred[crx - 1];
> + for (int i = 0; i < crx*3; ++i)
> + ih += upPred[crx*3];
> +
> + int iv = (mb_pred[cry - 1][px+1]);
> + for (int i = 0; i < cry - 1; ++i) {
> + iv += (i + 1) * (*(mb_preds[uv][0]) - *(*predU2--));
> + }
> +
> + for (int j = 0; j < cry; ++j)
> + for (int i = 0; i < crx; ++i)
> + mb_pred[j][i] = (uint16) (max_imgpel_value * ((i * ih + iv)));
> + }
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 9:05 Alex Coplan
2024-01-22 17:09 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2024-01-22 22:34 ` Alex Coplan
2024-01-23 12:18 ` Richard Sandiford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mptsf2pmh1l.fsf@arm.com \
--to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=alex.coplan@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).