From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32B93858D20 for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 08:20:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B32B93858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C9C2F4; Mon, 22 May 2023 01:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (e121540-lin.manchester.arm.com [10.32.110.72]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2A553F59C; Mon, 22 May 2023 01:20:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Sandiford To: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai Mail-Followup-To: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai,gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rguenther@suse.de, pan2.li@intel.com, richard.sandiford@arm.com Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rguenther@suse.de, pan2.li@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V13] VECT: Fix bug of multiple-rgroup for length is counting elements References: <20230522081101.1570598-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 09:20:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20230522081101.1570598-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> (juzhe zhong's message of "Mon, 22 May 2023 16:11:01 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-22.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_NONE,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_SHORT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai writes: > From: Ju-Zhe Zhong > > Address comments from Richard that splits the patch of fixing multiple-rgroup > handling of length counting elements. > > This patch is fixing issue of handling multiple-rgroup of length is counting elements > > Before this patch, multiple rgroup run fail: > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-1.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-1.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-1.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-1.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-1.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-1.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-1.c execution test > > After this patch, These tests are all passed. OK, thanks. Richard