From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Lewis Hyatt <lhyatt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pch: Fix streaming of strings with embedded null bytes
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:17:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mpty1tc80u9.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y0/oz//n0llKgOvI@tucnak> (Jakub Jelinek's message of "Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:08:47 +0200")
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 12:54:11PM +0100, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>> > When a GTY'ed struct is streamed to PCH, any plain char* pointers it contains
>> > (whether they live in GC-controlled memory or not) will be marked for PCH
>> > output by the routine gt_pch_note_object in ggc-common.cc. This routine
>> > special-cases plain char* strings, and in particular it uses strlen() to get
>> > their length. Thus it does not handle strings with embedded null bytes, but it
>> > is possible for something PCH cares about (such as a string literal token in a
>> > macro definition) to contain such embedded nulls. To fix that up, add a new
>> > GTY option "string_length" so that gt_pch_note_object can be informed the
>> > actual length it ought to use, and use it in the relevant libcpp structs
>> > (cpp_string and ht_identifier) accordingly.
>>
>> This isn't really my area, as I'm about to demonstrate with this
>> question, but: regarding
>>
>> if (note_ptr_fn == gt_pch_p_S)
>> (*slot)->size = strlen ((const char *)obj) + 1;
>> else
>> (*slot)->size = ggc_get_size (obj);
>>
>> do you know why the PCH code goes out of its way to handle the sizes of
>> strings specially? Are there enough garbage strings in the string pool
>> that it's worth optimising the size of the saved memory for strings but
>> not for other types of object? Or is the gt_pch_p_S test needed for
>> correctness, rather than just being an optimisation?
>
> Just guessing, not all GC strings live in the stringpool.
> Isn't e.g. ggc_strdup just a GC allocation where the string length
> isn't stored anywhere?
Is that different from other GC VLA allocations though? I thought
ultimately we just tried to save and restore the containing pages.
> And sometimes it isn't even GC allocated, e.g. ggc_strdup ("") just
> returns ""; I guess const char * pointers in GC memory can also point
> to string literals in .rodata and for PCH we move them.
Ah, OK, that would definitely explain it, thanks. In that case,
are you OK with the patch, as a way of continuing to support rodata
string pointers while also allowing embedded nuls?
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 22:14 Lewis Hyatt
2022-10-19 11:54 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-10-19 12:08 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-19 12:17 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2022-10-19 12:23 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-19 12:47 ` Lewis Hyatt
2023-07-04 15:50 ` 'unsigned int len' field in 'libcpp/include/symtab.h:struct ht_identifier' (was: [PATCH] pch: Fix streaming of strings with embedded null bytes) Thomas Schwinge
2023-07-04 19:56 ` Lewis Hyatt
2023-07-05 7:56 ` GTY: Enhance 'string_length' option documentation (was: 'unsigned int len' field in 'libcpp/include/symtab.h:struct ht_identifier' (was: [PATCH] pch: Fix streaming of strings with embedded null bytes)) Thomas Schwinge
2023-07-05 8:15 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-05 7:50 ` GTY: Explicitly reject 'string_length' option for (fields in) global variables (was: [PATCH] pch: Fix streaming of strings with embedded null bytes) Thomas Schwinge
2023-07-05 8:13 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mpty1tc80u9.fsf@arm.com \
--to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=lhyatt@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).