From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25296 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2018 07:12:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25285 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2018 07:12:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=_ZTV2X2, _ztv2x2 X-HELO: mx1.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 07:12:56 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923D9AFD9; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 07:12:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Andreas Schwab To: Jason Merrill Cc: Marek Polacek , GCC Patches , Jakub Jelinek Subject: Re: C++ PATCH to implement P1064R0, Virtual Function Calls in Constant Expressions (v4) References: <20180914204521.GJ5587@redhat.com> <20180917213938.GL5587@redhat.com> <20180918152558.GP16755@redhat.com> <20180918185534.GR16755@redhat.com> <20180919140518.GN5587@redhat.com> <20180919151023.GO5587@redhat.com> X-Yow: Today, THREE WINOS from DETROIT sold me a framed photo of TAB HUNTER before his MAKEOVER! Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jason Merrill's message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:25:09 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg01117.txt.bz2 On Sep 19 2018, Jason Merrill wrote: > Andreas, do the new testcases pass? That would surprise me, but OK if so. No, they don't. /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:29:26: error: non-constant condition for static assertion /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:29:23: error: expression '((& X2::_ZTV2X2) + 16)' does not designate a 'constexpr' function /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:33:26: error: non-constant condition for static assertion /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:33:23: error: expression '((& X2::_ZTV2X2) + 16)' does not designate a 'constexpr' function /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:37:27: error: non-constant condition for static assertion /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:37:24: error: expression '((& X2::_ZTV2X2) + 16)' does not designate a 'constexpr' function /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:41:26: error: non-constant condition for static assertion /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:41:23: error: expression '((& X4::_ZTV2X4) + 16)' does not designate a 'constexpr' function /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:45:26: error: non-constant condition for static assertion /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:45:23: error: expression '((& X4::_ZTV2X4) + 16)' does not designate a 'constexpr' function /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:49:27: error: non-constant condition for static assertion /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:49:24: error: expression '((& X4::_ZTV2X4) + 16)' does not designate a 'constexpr' function compiler exited with status 1 FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C (test for excess errors) Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."