From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-335847-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31730 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2013 13:34:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 31639 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jan 2013 13:34:23 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from cantor2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:34:18 +0000
Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254])	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6005BA3A4A;	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:34:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: ramrad01@arm.com
Cc: Xinyu Qi <xyqi@marvell.com>,	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH, ARM, iWMMXT] Fix define_constants for WCGR
References: <1338264799-12374-1-git-send-email-mattst88@gmail.com>	<1338264799-12374-2-git-send-email-mattst88@gmail.com>	<CACUk7=UEgAUSm6WhRGgK61pF-XVeRxOr4n+ztzkNfP49hVoZ_A@mail.gmail.com>	<4737A960563B524DA805CA602BE04B3069CA83A0BE@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com>	<50FE7EF3.6040900@arm.com>
X-Yow: Do you have exactly what I want in a plaid poindexter bar bat??
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:34:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <50FE7EF3.6040900@arm.com> (Ramana Radhakrishnan's message of	"Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:58:43 +0000")
Message-ID: <mvm4ni9uysn.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01090.txt.bz2

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramrad01@arm.com> writes:

> The patch by itself is OK but surprisingly I never saw this earlier. Your
> ping has removed the date from the original post so I couldn't track it
> down.

You can follow the references and look up the message-id via
http://mid.gmane.org/<msg-id>.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."