From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-459494-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23538 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2017 10:53:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23521 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2017 10:52:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.suse.de
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:52:58 +0000
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254])	by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F60D75028;	Tue,  1 Aug 2017 10:52:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org>,  Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>,  "Richard Earnshaw \(lists\)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,  Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>,  Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>,  GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,  Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,  nd@arm.com,  Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>,  Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,  Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,  Takahiro Akashi <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,  Andrew Wafaa <Andrew.Wafaa@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option
References: <20170706140311.GA20710@suse.de>	<d3e6d7a1-1f1c-c0b5-133a-0ab29eb5034d@arm.com>	<20170707193028.GA17752@suse.de> <mvmbmo7uvuu.fsf@suse.de>	<20170726142629.GG22969@suse.de> <mvm379juv2y.fsf@suse.de>	<F3E4420A-1F0D-48F0-978B-4A6C0B65A4E1@linaro.org>	<alpine.LSU.2.21.1708010442150.25964@anthias.pfeifer.com>
X-Yow: Yow!  Those people look exactly like Donnie and Marie Osmond!!
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:53:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1708010442150.25964@anthias.pfeifer.com> (Gerald	Pfeifer's message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2017 04:43:51 -0600 (MDT)")
Message-ID: <mvm8tj3r24a.fsf@suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2

On Aug 01 2017, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> I don't see an easy way to correctly differentiate between "attribute" 
>> nops and "bundle" nops, so XFAILing these tests on ia64 seems like a 
>> valid approach.
>
> Make sense, given that the use of Itanium has gone done drastically.

You can get the same failure with any target, for example if there are
delay slots to be filled.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."