From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4)
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mvmfunvs1gj.fsf@hawking.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1655866.vCpVy9sPsK@polaris> (Eric Botcazou's message of "Sun, 16 Oct 2016 22:28:57 +0200")
On Okt 16 2016, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> this is the updated version of the patch initially posted at:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02016.html
>> It takes into account Jeff's remarks, both on the code and the
>> documentation.
>>
>> As discussed, I'm going to split it into 4 parts: common infrastructure, Ada
>> front-end bits, individual back-end changes, testsuite. It was
>> bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-suse-linux but AdaCore has been using
>> it on native platforms (Linux, Windows, Solaris, etc) and various
>> architectures (x86, PowerPC, SPARC, ARM, etc) for years.
>
> I've installed part #1, #2, #4 and part #3 for x86, PowerPC, SPARC and IA-64.
> The PowerPC and SPARC bits as approved, the x86 and IA-64 bits as obvious.
On ia64 I get this regression:
FAIL: gcc.dg/Wtrampolines.c (test for warnings, line 31)
Since ia64 never uses trampolines this is probably ok and the test
should be adjusted.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-04 20:10 Eric Botcazou
2016-09-04 20:12 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (1/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-12 19:41 ` Jeff Law
2016-09-12 19:45 ` Jeff Law
2016-12-05 20:52 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2016-12-05 21:29 ` Lynn A. Boger
2016-12-05 22:41 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2016-12-05 22:12 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-06 17:52 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-06 20:18 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2016-12-06 21:59 ` Lynn A. Boger
2016-12-06 22:26 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-07 13:38 ` Lynn A. Boger
2016-12-07 13:56 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-07 7:23 ` Eric Botcazou
2017-03-23 16:48 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-03-28 17:01 ` Eric Botcazou
2017-03-29 10:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-03-29 14:05 ` Eric Botcazou
2017-03-29 14:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-09-04 20:14 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (2/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-04 20:15 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (3/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-05 10:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-12 19:56 ` Jeff Law
2016-09-04 21:31 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (4/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-10-16 20:29 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-10-17 10:40 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2016-10-17 11:14 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-10-17 22:35 ` Eric Botcazou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mvmfunvs1gj.fsf@hawking.suse.de \
--to=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).