public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, nd@arm.com, jlaw@tachyum.com,
	 richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]middle-end cse: Make sure duplicate elements are not entered into the equivalence set [PR103404]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:01:36 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <n627ssp8-s3sn-84s-131r-s1q740r226p3@fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patch-15109-tamar@arm.com>

On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, Tamar Christina wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> CSE uses equivalence classes to keep track of expressions that all have the same
> values at the current point in the program.
> 
> Normal equivalences through SETs only insert and perform lookups in this set but
> equivalence determined from comparisons, e.g.
> 
> (insn 46 44 47 7 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
>         (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 105 [ iD.2893 ])
>             (const_int 0 [0]))) "cse.c":18:22 7 {*cmpsi_ccno_1}
>      (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 105 [ iD.2893 ])
>         (nil)))
> 
> creates the equivalence EQ on (reg:SI 105 [ iD.2893 ]) and (const_int 0 [0]).
> 
> This causes a merge to happen between the two equivalence sets denoted by
> (const_int 0 [0]) and (reg:SI 105 [ iD.2893 ]) respectively.
> 
> The operation happens through merge_equiv_classes however this function has an
> invariant that the classes to be merge not contain any duplicates.  This is
> because it frees entries before merging.
> 
> The given testcase when using the supplied flags trigger an ICE due to the
> equivalence set being
> 
> (rr) p dump_class (class1)
> Equivalence chain for (reg:SI 105 [ iD.2893 ]):
> (reg:SI 105 [ iD.2893 ])
> $3 = void
> 
> (rr) p dump_class (class2)
> Equivalence chain for (const_int 0 [0]):
> (const_int 0 [0])
> (reg:SI 97 [ _10 ])
> (reg:SI 97 [ _10 ])
> $4 = void
> 
> This happens because the original INSN being recorded is
> 
> (insn 18 17 24 2 (set (subreg:V1SI (reg:SI 97 [ _10 ]) 0)
>         (const_vector:V1SI [
>                 (const_int 0 [0])
>             ])) "cse.c":11:9 1363 {*movv1si_internal}
>      (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:SI 97 [ _10 ])
>         (nil)))
> 
> and we end up generating two equivalences. the first one is simply that
> reg:SI 97 is 0.  The second one is that 0 can be extracted from the V1SI, so
> subreg (subreg:V1SI (reg:SI 97) 0) 0 == 0.  This nested subreg gets folded away
> to just reg:SI 97 and we re-insert the same equivalence.
> 
> This patch changes it so that once we figure out the bucket to insert into we
> check if the equivalence set already contains the entry and if so just return
> the existing entry and exit.
> 
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu,
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and no regressions.
> 
> 
> Ok for master?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tamar
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	PR rtl-optimization/103404
> 	* cse.c (insert_with_costs): Check if item exists already before adding
> 	a new entry in the equivalence class.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	PR rtl-optimization/103404
> 	* gcc.target/i386/pr103404.c: New test.
> 
> --- inline copy of patch -- 
> diff --git a/gcc/cse.c b/gcc/cse.c
> index c1c7d0ca27b73c4b944b4719f95fece74e0358d5..08295246c594109e947276051c6776e4cabca4ec 100644
> --- a/gcc/cse.c
> +++ b/gcc/cse.c
> @@ -1537,6 +1537,17 @@ insert_with_costs (rtx x, struct table_elt *classp, unsigned int hash,
>    if (REG_P (x) && REGNO (x) < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
>      add_to_hard_reg_set (&hard_regs_in_table, GET_MODE (x), REGNO (x));
>  
> +  /* We cannot allow a duplicate to be entered into the equivalence sets
> +     and so we should perform a check before we do any allocations or
> +     change the buckets.  */
> +  if (classp)
> +    {
> +      struct table_elt *p;
> +      for (p = classp; p; p = p->next_same_value)
> +	if (exp_equiv_p (p->exp, x, 1, false))
> +	  return p;

not really a review, leaving that to who approved the original change,
but these things always look bad - this linear list walk makes
insert_with_costs quadratic.  Is there any mitigation (like limiting
the number of entries?), is that already an existing problem elsewhere
in CSE?

> +    }
> +
>    /* Put an element for X into the right hash bucket.  */
>  
>    elt = free_element_chain;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr103404.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr103404.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66f33645301db09503fc0977fd0f061a19e56ea5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr103404.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-Og -fcse-follow-jumps -fno-dce -fno-early-inlining -fgcse -fharden-conditional-branches -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-ccp -mavx5124fmaps -std=c99 -w" } */
> +
> +typedef unsigned __attribute__((__vector_size__ (4))) U;
> +typedef unsigned __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
> +typedef unsigned __attribute__((__vector_size__ (64))) W;
> +
> +int x, y;
> +
> +V v;
> +W w;
> +
> +inline
> +int bar (U a)
> +{
> +  a |= x;
> +  W k =
> +    __builtin_shufflevector (v, 5 / a,
> +			     2, 4, 0, 2, 4, 1, 0, 1,
> +			     1, 2, 1, 3, 0, 4, 4, 0);
> +  w = k;
> +  y = 0;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +foo ()
> +{
> +  bar ((U){0xffffffff});
> +  for (unsigned i; i < sizeof (foo);)
> +    ;
> +}
> +
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-29  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-29  7:40 Tamar Christina
2021-11-29  9:01 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2021-11-29  9:16   ` Tamar Christina
2021-12-02 14:12     ` Tamar Christina
2021-12-06  9:54       ` Tamar Christina
2021-12-06 10:10         ` Richard Sandiford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=n627ssp8-s3sn-84s-131r-s1q740r226p3@fhfr.qr \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jlaw@tachyum.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=tamar.christina@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).