public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tree-optimization/101280 - revise interchange fix for PR101173
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 08:54:09 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2107020853440.9200@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2107020802300.9200@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

On Fri, 2 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Jul 2021, Michael Matz wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Thu, 1 Jul 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> > 
> > > diff --git a/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc b/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc
> > > index 43045c5455e..43ef112a2d0 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc
> > > @@ -1043,8 +1043,11 @@ tree_loop_interchange::valid_data_dependences (unsigned i_idx, unsigned o_idx,
> > >  	    continue;
> > >  
> > >  	  /* Be conservative, skip case if either direction at i_idx/o_idx
> > > -	     levels is not '=' (for the inner loop) or '<'.  */
> > > -	  if (dist_vect[i_idx] < 0 || dist_vect[o_idx] <= 0)
> > > +	     levels is not '=' or '<'.  */
> > > +	  if (dist_vect[i_idx] < 0
> > > +	      || (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[i_idx] > 0)
> > > +	      || dist_vect[o_idx] < 0
> > > +	      || (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[o_idx] > 0))
> > 
> > Hmm, if DDR_REVERSED_P matters here, then it should matter for all arms.  
> > IOW: < 0 should be tested only when !DDR_REVERSED_P, not always:
> > 
> >        if ((!DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[i_idx] < 0)
> >            || (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[i_idx] > 0)
> >            || (!DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[o_idx] < 0)
> >            || (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[o_idx] > 0))
> > 
> > (what you have effectively written is a condition that allows only 0 when 
> > DDR_REVERSED_P)
> 
> True - been fixing bugs too fast I guess.  Maybe the 3rd time's the charm 
> then ;)

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.

Richard.

From 094af28137de5c55a21123c3b4e06e7d7a08bb5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 08:51:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] tree-optimization/101280 - re-revise interchange fix for
 PR101173
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

The following fixes up the revision of the original fix for PR101173
to properly guard all dependence checks with DDR_REVERSED_P or its
inverse.

2021-07-01  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

	PR tree-optimization/101280
	PR tree-optimization/101173
	* gimple-loop-interchange.cc
	(tree_loop_interchange::valid_data_dependences): Properly
	guard all dependence checks with DDR_REVERSED_P or its
	inverse.
---
 gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc b/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc
index 43ef112a2d0..7a88faa2c07 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc
@@ -1044,9 +1044,9 @@ tree_loop_interchange::valid_data_dependences (unsigned i_idx, unsigned o_idx,
 
 	  /* Be conservative, skip case if either direction at i_idx/o_idx
 	     levels is not '=' or '<'.  */
-	  if (dist_vect[i_idx] < 0
+	  if ((!DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[i_idx] < 0)
 	      || (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[i_idx] > 0)
-	      || dist_vect[o_idx] < 0
+	      || (!DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[o_idx] < 0)
 	      || (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[o_idx] > 0))
 	    return false;
 	}
-- 
2.26.2


      reply	other threads:[~2021-07-02  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-01 11:38 Richard Biener
2021-07-01 14:49 ` Michael Matz
2021-07-02  6:03   ` Richard Biener
2021-07-02  6:54     ` Richard Biener [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.76.2107020853440.9200@zhemvz.fhfr.qr \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=matz@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).