public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
Cc: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	 Nick Alcock via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch][version 6] add -ftrivial-auto-var-init and variable attribute "uninitialized" to gcc
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:29:54 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2108171022430.11781@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8B2F93E8-C3AC-49D2-B764-D4DD8A150A52@oracle.com>

On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:

> My current code for expand_DEFERRED_INIT is like the following, could you check and see whether there is any issue for it:
> 
> #define INIT_PATTERN_VALUE  0xFE
> static void
> expand_DEFERRED_INIT (internal_fn, gcall *stmt)
> {
>   tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
>   tree var_size = gimple_call_arg (stmt, 0);
>   enum auto_init_type init_type
>     = (enum auto_init_type) TREE_INT_CST_LOW (gimple_call_arg (stmt, 1));
>   bool is_vla = (bool) TREE_INT_CST_LOW (gimple_call_arg (stmt, 2));
> 
>   tree var_type = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
>   gcc_assert (init_type > AUTO_INIT_UNINITIALIZED);
> 
>   if (is_vla || (!use_register_for_decl (lhs)))
>     {
>       if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME)
>         lhs = SSA_NAME_VAR (lhs);

this should not be necessary (in fact you shouldn't see a SSA_NAME
here, if you do then using SSA_NAME_VAR is wrong)

>     /* If this is a VLA or the variable is not in register,
>        expand to a memset to initialize it.  */
>       tree var_addr = NULL_TREE;
>       if (is_vla)
>         var_addr = TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 0);
>       else
>         {
>           TREE_ADDRESSABLE (lhs) = 1;
>           var_addr = build_fold_addr_expr (lhs);
>         }

use, independent of is_vla

         mark_addressable (lhs);
         var_addr = build_fold_addr_expr (lhs);

> 
>       tree value = (init_type == AUTO_INIT_PATTERN) ?
>                     build_int_cst (unsigned_char_type_node,
>                                    INIT_PATTERN_VALUE) :
>                     build_zero_cst (unsigned_char_type_node);

since memset has an integer argument for the value use
integer_zero_node for the zero case and build_int_cst (integer_type_node, 
...) for the pattern case

>       tree m_call = build_call_expr (builtin_decl_implicit (BUILT_IN_MEMSET),
>                                      3, var_addr, value, var_size);
>       /* Expand this memset call.  */
>       expand_builtin_memset (m_call, NULL_RTX, TYPE_MODE (var_type));
>     }
>   else
>     {
>     /* If this variable is in a register, use expand_assignment might
>        generate better code.  */
>       tree pattern = NULL_TREE;
>       unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT total_bytes
>         = tree_to_uhwi (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (var_type));
> 
>       if (init_type == AUTO_INIT_PATTERN)
>         {
>           if (can_native_interpret_type_p (var_type))
>             {
>               unsigned char *buf = (unsigned char *) xmalloc (total_bytes);
>               memset (buf, INIT_PATTERN_VALUE, total_bytes);
>               pattern = native_interpret_expr (var_type, buf, total_bytes);
>               gcc_assert (pattern);
>             }
>           else
>             {
>               tree index_type = build_index_type (size_int (total_bytes - 1));
>               tree array_type = build_array_type (unsigned_char_type_node,
>                                                   index_type);
>               tree element = build_int_cst (unsigned_char_type_node,
>                                             INIT_PATTERN_VALUE);
>               vec<constructor_elt, va_gc> *elts = NULL;
>               for (unsigned int i = 0; i < total_bytes; i++)
>                 CONSTRUCTOR_APPEND_ELT (elts, NULL_TREE, element);
>               pattern = build_constructor (array_type, elts);
>               pattern = build1 (VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, var_type, pattern);
>             }
>         }
> 
>       tree init = (init_type == AUTO_INIT_PATTERN) ?
>                    pattern :
>                    build_zero_cst (var_type);

maybe conditionally initialize init instead of pattern and init?
Thus replace pattern by init and do

        else
          init = build_zero_cst (var_type);


the above should work, as said the RTL expansion part can possibly
be improved but we can do this as followup as well.

>       expand_assignment (lhs, init, false);
>     }
> }
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Qing
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-17  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27  3:26 Qing Zhao
2021-07-28 20:21 ` Kees Cook
2021-07-28 21:53   ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-09 14:09 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-09 16:38   ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-09 17:14     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10  7:36     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 13:39       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 14:16         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:02           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 15:22             ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:55               ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 20:16               ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 22:26                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11  7:02                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:33                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:37                       ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:54                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:58                           ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 14:00                             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 15:30                             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 15:53                               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:22                                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:55                                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:57                                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 20:30                                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 22:03                                       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16  7:12                                         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 14:48                                           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 15:08                                             ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:39                                               ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16  7:11                                       ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 16:48                                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 15:04                                           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 20:40                                             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18  7:19                                               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-18 14:39                                                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11  9:02                   ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 13:44                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:15                       ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 16:29                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 19:24   ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 22:45     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16  7:40     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:45       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17  8:29         ` Richard Biener [this message]
2021-08-17 14:50           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 16:08             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18  7:15               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-18 16:02                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-19  9:00                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-19 13:54                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-20 14:52                       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-23 13:55                       ` Richard Biener
2021-09-02 17:24                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 19:49       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17  8:43         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:03           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 14:45             ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:53               ` Qing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.76.2108171022430.11781@zhemvz.fhfr.qr \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=mjambor@suse.cz \
    --cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).