From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Nick Alcock via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch][version 6] add -ftrivial-auto-var-init and variable attribute "uninitialized" to gcc
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:15:49 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2108180904220.11781@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <986D883E-A346-456A-B335-4185D4B136B5@oracle.com>
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 17, 2021, at 9:50 AM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Aug 17, 2021, at 3:29 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
> >>
> >>> My current code for expand_DEFERRED_INIT is like the following, could you check and see whether there is any issue for it:
> >>>
> >>> #define INIT_PATTERN_VALUE 0xFE
> >>> static void
> >>> expand_DEFERRED_INIT (internal_fn, gcall *stmt)
> >>> {
> >>> tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
> >>> tree var_size = gimple_call_arg (stmt, 0);
> >>> enum auto_init_type init_type
> >>> = (enum auto_init_type) TREE_INT_CST_LOW (gimple_call_arg (stmt, 1));
> >>> bool is_vla = (bool) TREE_INT_CST_LOW (gimple_call_arg (stmt, 2));
> >>>
> >>> tree var_type = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
> >>> gcc_assert (init_type > AUTO_INIT_UNINITIALIZED);
> >>>
> >>> if (is_vla || (!use_register_for_decl (lhs)))
> >>> {
> >>> if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME)
> >>> lhs = SSA_NAME_VAR (lhs);
> >>
> >> this should not be necessary (in fact you shouldn't see a SSA_NAME
> >> here, if you do then using SSA_NAME_VAR is wrong)
> > You mean during RTL expansion phase, all SSA_NAMEs are gone already?
>
> Actually, the lhs could be SSA_NAME here,
>
> Breakpoint 1, expand_DEFERRED_INIT (stmt=0x7fffe96ae348) at ../../latest-gcc/gcc/internal-fn.c:3021
> 3021 mark_addressable (lhs);
> (gdb) call debug_tree(lhs)
> <ssa_name 0x7fffe9584e58
> type <real_type 0x7fffe959b2a0 float sizes-gimplified SF
> size <integer_cst 0x7fffe9579f48 constant 32>
> unit-size <integer_cst 0x7fffe9579f60 constant 4>
> align:32 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set 2 canonical-type 0x7fffe959b2a0 precision:32
> pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7fffe959b7e0>>
> visited var <var_decl 0x7ffff7ff7bd0 temp1>
> def_stmt temp1_5 = .DEFERRED_INIT (4, 2, 0, &"temp1"[0]);
> version:5>
>
> when I deleted:
>
> if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME
> lhs = SSA_NAME_VAR (lhs);
but then using SSA_NAME_VAR is broken. I suspect use_register_for_decl
isn't the correct thing to look at. I think we need to look at what
the LHS expanded to if it is a SSA_VAR_P (that includes SSA names
but also plain DECLs but not what we get from VLAs where we'd see
*ptr). So sth like
bool reg_lhs;
if (SSA_VAR_P (lhs))
{
rtx tem = expand_expr (lhs, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE);
reg_lhs = !MEM_P (tem);
/* If not MEM_P reg_lhs should be REG_P or SUBREG_P (but maybe
also CONCAT or lowpart...?) */
}
else
{
gcc_assert (is_vla);
reg_lhs = false;
}
if (!reg_lhs)
memset path
else
expand_assignment path
> Many testing cases failed with internal compiler error:
>
> /home/opc/Work/GCC/latest-gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/auto-init-3.c:9:9: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8437
> 0xe237aa expand_expr_addr_expr_1
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:8437
> 0xe24059 expand_expr_addr_expr
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:8525
> 0xe32b56 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:11741
> 0xe2da52 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:10777
> 0xe24706 expand_expr_real(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:8713
> 0xc13f15 expand_expr
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.h:301
> 0xc17acb get_memory_rtx
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/builtins.c:1370
> 0xc2223d expand_builtin_memset_args
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/builtins.c:4102
> 0xc21a20 expand_builtin_memset(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode)
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/builtins.c:3886
> 0xfb5c85 expand_DEFERRED_INIT
> ../../latest-gcc/gcc/internal-fn.c:3031
>
>
> So, did I do anything wrong?
>
> Qing
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-18 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 3:26 Qing Zhao
2021-07-28 20:21 ` Kees Cook
2021-07-28 21:53 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-09 14:09 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-09 16:38 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-09 17:14 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 7:36 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 13:39 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 14:16 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:02 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 15:22 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:55 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 20:16 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 22:26 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 7:02 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:33 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:37 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:54 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:58 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 14:00 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 15:30 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 15:53 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:22 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:55 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:57 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 20:30 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 22:03 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 7:12 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 14:48 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 15:08 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:39 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 7:11 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 16:48 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 15:04 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 20:40 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18 7:19 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-18 14:39 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 9:02 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 13:44 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:15 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 16:29 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 19:24 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 22:45 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 7:40 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:45 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 8:29 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:50 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 16:08 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18 7:15 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2021-08-18 16:02 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-19 9:00 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-19 13:54 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-20 14:52 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-23 13:55 ` Richard Biener
2021-09-02 17:24 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 19:49 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 8:43 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:03 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 14:45 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:53 ` Qing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.76.2108180904220.11781@zhemvz.fhfr.qr \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).