From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E00523858D39 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:23:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E00523858D39 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63B522227; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from murzim.suse.de (murzim.suse.de [10.160.4.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5F73A3B9C; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:23:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Biener To: Kees Cook cc: Qing Zhao , Nick Alcock via Gcc-patches , Richard Sandiford , Martin Jambor Subject: Re: [COMMITTED][patch][version 9]add -ftrivial-auto-var-init and variable attribute "uninitialized" to gcc In-Reply-To: <202109091605.8168A6AB4@keescook> Message-ID: References: <202109091605.8168A6AB4@keescook> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_SHORT, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:23:47 -0000 On Thu, 9 Sep 2021, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:49:11PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote: > > Hi, FYI > > > > I just committed the following patch to gcc upstream: > > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2021-September/353195.html > > Hurray! Thank you so much for working on this, and thanks also to the > reviewers and everyone else poking at it. > > I will go update my Linux Plumbers slides to say "supported" instead of > "proposed". :) Can you two work on wording to add to gcc-12/changes.html for this feature? I think it deserves a release note. Likewise the CTF/BTF support btw. Thanks, Richard.