public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
Cc: "joseph@codesourcery.com" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	 "siddhesh@gotplt.org" <siddhesh@gotplt.org>,
	 "keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	 "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [v4][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field including C99 FAM [PR101832]
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:04:53 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2303140903160.18795@jbgna.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DE8783A7-43EC-4D4A-B083-4883DE71C336@oracle.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 22752 bytes --]

On Mon, 13 Mar 2023, Qing Zhao wrote:

> Hi, Richard,
> 
> Do you have more comments on my responds to your previous questions?

No, generally we're not good at naming the shared bits, so keeping the
old name is fine here.

Btw, I do not feel competent enough to approve the patch, instead that's
on the burden of the C frontend maintainers and the people understanding
the object-size code more.

Richard.

> thanks.
> 
> Qing
> 
> > On Mar 10, 2023, at 8:48 AM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On Mar 10, 2023, at 2:54 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, Qing Zhao wrote:
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> On Mar 9, 2023, at 7:20 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, Qing Zhao wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> GCC extension accepts the case when a struct with a C99 flexible array member
> >>>>> is embedded into another struct or union (possibly recursively).
> >>>>> __builtin_object_size should treat such struct as flexible size.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> gcc/c/ChangeLog:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 	PR tree-optimization/101832
> >>>>> 	* c-decl.cc (finish_struct): Set TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY for
> >>>>> 	struct/union type.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I can't really comment on the correctness of this part but since
> >>>> only the C frontend will ever set this and you are using it from
> >>>> addr_object_size which is also used for other C family languages
> >>>> (at least), I wonder if you can really test
> >>>> 
> >>>> +                       if (!TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY (TREE_TYPE (v)))
> >>>> 
> >>>> there.
> >>> 
> >>> You mean for C++ and also other C family languages (other than C), the above bit cannot be set?
> >>> Yes, that’s true. The bit is only set for C. So is the bit DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY, which is only set for C too. 
> >>> So, I am wondering whether the bit DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY should be also set in middle end? Or we can set DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY in C++ FE too? And then we can set TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY also in C++ FE?
> >>> What’s your suggestion?
> >>> 
> >>> (I personally feel that DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY and TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY should be set in the same places).
> >> 
> >> I was wondering if the above test errors on the conservative side
> >> correctly - it will now, for all but C, cut off some thing where it
> >> didn't before?
> > 
> > As long as the default value of TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY reflects the correct conservative  behavior, then the testing should be correct, right?
> > 
> > The default value of TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY is 0, i.e, FALSE, means that the TYPE does not include a flex array by default, this is the correct behavior. Only when the TYPE does include a flexiarray, it will be set to TRUE. So, I think it’s correct.
> > 
> > This is a different situation for DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY, by default, the compiler will treat ALL trailing arrays as FMA, so in order to keep the correct conservative behavior, we should keep the default value for DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY as it’s a FMA, i.e, DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY being FALSE, by default. Only when the array is NOT a FMA, we set it to true. 
> > 
> > So, the default value for TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY is correct. 
> >> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Originally I was suggesting to set this flag in stor-layout.cc
> >>>> which eventually all languages funnel their types through and
> >>>> if there's language specific handling use a langhook (with the
> >>>> default implementation preserving the status quo).
> >>> 
> >>> If we decide to set the bits in stor-layout.cc, where is the best place to do it? I checked the star-layout.cc code, looks like “layout_type” might be the place where we can set these bits for RECORD_TYPE, UNION_TYPE? 
> >> 
> >> Yes, it would be layout_type.
> >> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Some more comments below ...
> >>>> 
> >>>>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 	PR tree-optimization/101832
> >>>>> 	* module.cc (trees_out::core_bools): Stream out new bit
> >>>>> 	type_include_flexarray.
> >>>>> 	(trees_in::core_bools): Stream in new bit type_include_flexarray.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 	PR tree-optimization/101832
> >>>>> 	* print-tree.cc (print_node): Print new bit type_include_flexarray.
> >>>>> 	* tree-core.h (struct tree_type_common): New bit
> >>>>> 	type_include_flexarray.
> >>>>> 	* tree-object-size.cc (addr_object_size): Handle structure/union type
> >>>>> 	when it has flexible size.
> >>>>> 	* tree-streamer-in.cc (unpack_ts_type_common_value_fields): Stream
> >>>>> 	in new bit type_include_flexarray.
> >>>>> 	* tree-streamer-out.cc (pack_ts_type_common_value_fields): Stream
> >>>>> 	out new bit type_include_flexarray.
> >>>>> 	* tree.h (TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY): New macro
> >>>>> 	TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 	PR tree-optimization/101832
> >>>>> 	* gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-pr101832.c: New test.
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> gcc/c/c-decl.cc                               |  12 ++
> >>>>> gcc/cp/module.cc                              |   2 +
> >>>>> gcc/print-tree.cc                             |   5 +
> >>>>> .../gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-pr101832.c     | 134 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>> gcc/tree-core.h                               |   4 +-
> >>>>> gcc/tree-object-size.cc                       |  79 +++++++----
> >>>>> gcc/tree-streamer-in.cc                       |   1 +
> >>>>> gcc/tree-streamer-out.cc                      |   1 +
> >>>>> gcc/tree.h                                    |   6 +
> >>>>> 9 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >>>>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-pr101832.c
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/c/c-decl.cc b/gcc/c/c-decl.cc
> >>>>> index 08078eadeb8..f589a2f5192 100644
> >>>>> --- a/gcc/c/c-decl.cc
> >>>>> +++ b/gcc/c/c-decl.cc
> >>>>> @@ -9284,6 +9284,18 @@ finish_struct (location_t loc, tree t, tree fieldlist, tree attributes,
> >>>>>     /* Set DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY flag for FIELD_DECL x.  */
> >>>>>     DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY (x) = !is_flexible_array_member_p (is_last_field, x);
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> +      /* Set TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY for the context of x, t
> >>>>> +       * when x is an array.  */
> >>>>> +      if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (x)) == ARRAY_TYPE)
> >>>>> +	TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY (t) = flexible_array_member_type_p (TREE_TYPE (x)) ;
> >>>>> +      /* Recursively set TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY for the context of x, t
> >>>>> +	 when x is the last field.  */
> >>>>> +      else if ((TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (x)) == RECORD_TYPE
> >>>>> +		|| TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (x)) == UNION_TYPE)
> >>>>> +	       && TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY (TREE_TYPE (x))
> >>>>> +	       && is_last_field)
> >>>>> +	TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY (t) = true;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>     if (DECL_NAME (x)
> >>>>> 	  || RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (x)))
> >>>>> 	saw_named_field = true;
> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> >>>>> index ac2fe66b080..c750361b704 100644
> >>>>> --- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
> >>>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> >>>>> @@ -5371,6 +5371,7 @@ trees_out::core_bools (tree t)
> >>>>>     WB (t->type_common.lang_flag_5);
> >>>>>     WB (t->type_common.lang_flag_6);
> >>>>>     WB (t->type_common.typeless_storage);
> >>>>> +      WB (t->type_common.type_include_flexarray);
> >>>>>   }
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> if (CODE_CONTAINS_STRUCT (code, TS_DECL_COMMON))
> >>>>> @@ -5551,6 +5552,7 @@ trees_in::core_bools (tree t)
> >>>>>     RB (t->type_common.lang_flag_5);
> >>>>>     RB (t->type_common.lang_flag_6);
> >>>>>     RB (t->type_common.typeless_storage);
> >>>>> +      RB (t->type_common.type_include_flexarray);
> >>>>>   }
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> if (CODE_CONTAINS_STRUCT (code, TS_DECL_COMMON))
> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/print-tree.cc b/gcc/print-tree.cc
> >>>>> index 1f3afcbbc86..efacdb7686f 100644
> >>>>> --- a/gcc/print-tree.cc
> >>>>> +++ b/gcc/print-tree.cc
> >>>>> @@ -631,6 +631,11 @@ print_node (FILE *file, const char *prefix, tree node, int indent,
> >>>>> 	  && TYPE_CXX_ODR_P (node))
> >>>>> 	fputs (" cxx-odr-p", file);
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> +      if ((code == RECORD_TYPE
> >>>>> +	   || code == UNION_TYPE)
> >>>>> +	  && TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY (node))
> >>>>> +	fputs (" include-flexarray", file);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>     /* The transparent-union flag is used for different things in
> >>>>> 	 different nodes.  */
> >>>>>     if ((code == UNION_TYPE || code == RECORD_TYPE)
> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-pr101832.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-pr101832.c
> >>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>> index 00000000000..60078e11634
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-pr101832.c
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
> >>>>> +/* PR 101832: 
> >>>>> +   GCC extension accepts the case when a struct with a C99 flexible array
> >>>>> +   member is embedded into another struct (possibly recursively).
> >>>>> +   __builtin_object_size will treat such struct as flexible size.
> >>>>> +   However, when a structure with non-C99 flexible array member, i.e, trailing
> >>>>> +   [0], [1], or [4], is embedded into anther struct, the stucture will not
> >>>>> +   be treated as flexible size.  */ 
> >>>>> +/* { dg-do run } */
> >>>>> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +#include "builtin-object-size-common.h"
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +#define expect(p, _v) do { \
> >>>>> +  size_t v = _v; \
> >>>>> +  if (p == v) \
> >>>>> +    __builtin_printf ("ok:  %s == %zd\n", #p, p); \
> >>>>> +  else {\
> >>>>> +    __builtin_printf ("WAT: %s == %zd (expected %zd)\n", #p, p, v); \
> >>>>> +    FAIL (); \
> >>>>> +  } \
> >>>>> +} while (0);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct A {
> >>>>> +  int n;
> >>>>> +  char data[];
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct B {
> >>>>> +  int m;
> >>>>> +  struct A a;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct C {
> >>>>> +  int q;
> >>>>> +  struct B b;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct A0 {
> >>>>> +  int n;
> >>>>> +  char data[0];
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct B0 {
> >>>>> +  int m;
> >>>>> +  struct A0 a;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct C0 {
> >>>>> +  int q;
> >>>>> +  struct B0 b;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct A1 {
> >>>>> +  int n;
> >>>>> +  char data[1];
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct B1 {
> >>>>> +  int m;
> >>>>> +  struct A1 a;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct C1 {
> >>>>> +  int q;
> >>>>> +  struct B1 b;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct An {
> >>>>> +  int n;
> >>>>> +  char data[8];
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct Bn {
> >>>>> +  int m;
> >>>>> +  struct An a;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +struct Cn {
> >>>>> +  int q;
> >>>>> +  struct Bn b;
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +volatile void *magic1, *magic2;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +int main (int argc, char *argv[])
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +  struct B *outer;
> >>>>> +  struct C *outest;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  /* Make sure optimization can't find some other object size. */
> >>>>> +  outer = (void *)magic1;
> >>>>> +  outest = (void *)magic2;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outer->a, 1), -1);
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outest->b, 1), -1);
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outest->b.a, 1), -1);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  struct B0 *outer0;
> >>>>> +  struct C0 *outest0;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  /* Make sure optimization can't find some other object size. */
> >>>>> +  outer0 = (void *)magic1;
> >>>>> +  outest0 = (void *)magic2;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outer0->a, 1), sizeof (outer0->a));
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outest0->b, 1), sizeof (outest0->b));
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outest0->b.a, 1), sizeof (outest0->b.a));
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  struct B1 *outer1;
> >>>>> +  struct C1 *outest1;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  /* Make sure optimization can't find some other object size. */
> >>>>> +  outer1 = (void *)magic1;
> >>>>> +  outest1 = (void *)magic2;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outer1->a, 1), sizeof (outer1->a));
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outest1->b, 1), sizeof (outest1->b));
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outest1->b.a, 1), sizeof (outest1->b.a));
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  struct Bn *outern;
> >>>>> +  struct Cn *outestn;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  /* Make sure optimization can't find some other object size. */
> >>>>> +  outern = (void *)magic1;
> >>>>> +  outestn = (void *)magic2;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outern->a, 1), sizeof (outern->a));
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outestn->b, 1), sizeof (outestn->b));
> >>>>> +  expect (__builtin_object_size (&outestn->b.a, 1), sizeof (outestn->b.a));
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  DONE ();
> >>>>> +  return 0;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-core.h b/gcc/tree-core.h
> >>>>> index acd8deea34e..705d5702b9c 100644
> >>>>> --- a/gcc/tree-core.h
> >>>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-core.h
> >>>>> @@ -1718,7 +1718,9 @@ struct GTY(()) tree_type_common {
> >>>>> unsigned empty_flag : 1;
> >>>>> unsigned indivisible_p : 1;
> >>>>> RECORD_OR_UNION_CHECK
> >>>> 
> >>>> it looks like the bit could be eventually shared with
> >>>> no_named_args_stdarg_p (but its accessor doesn't use
> >>>> FUNC_OR_METHOD_CHECK)
> >>> You mean to let “type_include_flexarray” share the same bit with “no_named_args_stdarg_p” in order to save 1-bit space in IR?
> >>> Then change the 
> >>> 
> >>> /* True if this is a stdarg function with no named arguments (C2x
> >>>  (...) prototype, where arguments can be accessed with va_start and
> >>>  va_arg), as opposed to an unprototyped function.  */
> >>> #define TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P(NODE) \
> >>> (TYPE_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.no_named_args_stdarg_p)
> >>> 
> >>> /* True if this RECORD_TYPE or UNION_TYPE includes a flexible array member
> >>>  at the last field recursively.  */
> >>> #define TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY(NODE) \
> >>> (TYPE_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.type_include_flexarray)
> >>> 
> >>> To:
> >>> 
> >>> union {
> >>>   unsigned no_named_args_stdarg_p : 1;
> >>>   /* TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY flag for RECORD_TYPE and UNION_TYPE.  */
> >>>   unsigned int type_include_flexarray : 1;
> >>> } shared_bit;
> >>> unsigned spare : 15;
> >>> 
> >>> /* True if this is a stdarg function with no named arguments (C2x
> >>>  (...) prototype, where arguments can be accessed with va_start and
> >>>  va_arg), as opposed to an unprototyped function.  */
> >>> #define TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P(NODE) \
> >>> (FUNC_OR_METHOD_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.shared_bit.no_named_args_stdarg_p)
> >>> 
> >>> /* True if this RECORD_TYPE or UNION_TYPE includes a flexible array member
> >>>  at the last field recursively.  */
> >>> #define TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY(NODE) \
> >>> (RECORD_OR_UNION_CHECK(NODE)->type_common.shared_bit.type_include_flexarray)
> >> 
> >> No, we're just overloading bits by using the same name for different
> >> purposes.  I don't think such a union would pack nicely.  We overload
> >> by documenting the uses, in the above cases the uses are separated
> >> by the kind of the tree node, RECORD/UNION_TYPE vs. FUNCTION/METHOD_TYPE
> >> and the accessor macros should be updated to use the appropriate
> >> tree check macros covering that so we don't try to inspect the
> >> "wrong bit”.
> > Okay, I see. Then should I change the name of that bit to one that reflect two usages?
> >> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> alias_set_type alias_set;
> >>>>> tree pointer_to;
> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-object-size.cc b/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
> >>>>> index 9a936a91983..22b3c72ea6e 100644
> >>>>> --- a/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
> >>>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
> >>>>> @@ -633,45 +633,68 @@ addr_object_size (struct object_size_info *osi, const_tree ptr,
> >>>>> 		    v = NULL_TREE;
> >>>>> 		    break;
> >>>>> 		  case COMPONENT_REF:
> >>>>> -		    if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (v)) != ARRAY_TYPE)
> >>>>> +		    /* When the ref is not to an array, a record or a union, it
> >>>>> +		       will not have flexible size, compute the object size
> >>>>> +		       directly.  */
> >>>>> +		    if ((TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (v)) != ARRAY_TYPE)
> >>>>> +			&& (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (v)) != RECORD_TYPE)
> >>>>> +			&& (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (v)) != UNION_TYPE))
> >>>>> 		      {
> >>>>> 			v = NULL_TREE;
> >>>>> 			break;
> >>>>> 		      }
> >>>>> -		    is_flexible_array_mem_ref = array_ref_flexible_size_p (v);
> >>>>> -		    while (v != pt_var && TREE_CODE (v) == COMPONENT_REF)
> >>>>> -		      if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> -			  != UNION_TYPE
> >>>>> -			  && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> -			  != QUAL_UNION_TYPE)
> >>>>> -			break;
> >>>>> -		      else
> >>>>> -			v = TREE_OPERAND (v, 0);
> >>>>> -		    if (TREE_CODE (v) == COMPONENT_REF
> >>>>> -			&& TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> -			   == RECORD_TYPE)
> >>>>> +		    if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (v)) == RECORD_TYPE
> >>>>> +			|| TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (v)) == UNION_TYPE)
> >>>>> +		    /* if the record or union does not include a flexible array
> >>>>> +		       recursively, compute the object size directly.  */
> >>>>> 		      {
> >>>>> -			/* compute object size only if v is not a
> >>>>> -			   flexible array member.  */
> >>>>> -			if (!is_flexible_array_mem_ref)
> >>>>> +			if (!TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY (TREE_TYPE (v)))
> >>>>> 			  {
> >>>>> 			    v = NULL_TREE;
> >>>>> 			    break;
> >>>>> 			  }
> >>>>> -			v = TREE_OPERAND (v, 0);
> >>>>> +			else
> >>>>> +			  v = TREE_OPERAND (v, 0);
> >>>>> 		      }
> >>>>> -		    while (v != pt_var && TREE_CODE (v) == COMPONENT_REF)
> >>>>> -		      if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> -			  != UNION_TYPE
> >>>>> -			  && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> -			  != QUAL_UNION_TYPE)
> >>>>> -			break;
> >>>>> -		      else
> >>>>> -			v = TREE_OPERAND (v, 0);
> >>>>> -		    if (v != pt_var)
> >>>>> -		      v = NULL_TREE;
> >>>>> 		    else
> >>>>> -		      v = pt_var;
> >>>>> +		      {
> >>>>> +			/* Now the ref is to an array type.  */
> >>>>> +			is_flexible_array_mem_ref
> >>>>> +			  = array_ref_flexible_size_p (v);
> >>>>> +			while (v != pt_var && TREE_CODE (v) == COMPONENT_REF)
> >>>>> +			if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> +			      != UNION_TYPE
> >>>>> +			    && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> +				 != QUAL_UNION_TYPE)
> >>>>> +			  break;
> >>>>> +			else
> >>>>> +			  v = TREE_OPERAND (v, 0);
> >>>>> +			if (TREE_CODE (v) == COMPONENT_REF
> >>>>> +			    && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> +				 == RECORD_TYPE)
> >>>>> +			  {
> >>>>> +			    /* compute object size only if v is not a
> >>>>> +			       flexible array member.  */
> >>>>> +			    if (!is_flexible_array_mem_ref)
> >>>>> +			      {
> >>>>> +				v = NULL_TREE;
> >>>>> +				break;
> >>>>> +			      }
> >>>>> +			    v = TREE_OPERAND (v, 0);
> >>>>> +			  }
> >>>>> +			while (v != pt_var && TREE_CODE (v) == COMPONENT_REF)
> >>>>> +			  if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> +				!= UNION_TYPE
> >>>>> +			      && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> >>>>> +				   != QUAL_UNION_TYPE)
> >>>>> +			    break;
> >>>>> +			  else
> >>>>> +			    v = TREE_OPERAND (v, 0);
> >>>>> +			if (v != pt_var)
> >>>>> +			  v = NULL_TREE;
> >>>>> +			else
> >>>>> +			  v = pt_var;
> >>>>> +		      }
> >>>>> 		    break;
> >>>>> 		  default:
> >>>>> 		    v = pt_var;
> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-streamer-in.cc b/gcc/tree-streamer-in.cc
> >>>>> index d4dc30f048f..c19ede0631d 100644
> >>>>> --- a/gcc/tree-streamer-in.cc
> >>>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-streamer-in.cc
> >>>>> @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ unpack_ts_type_common_value_fields (struct bitpack_d *bp, tree expr)
> >>>>>     TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR (expr) = (unsigned) bp_unpack_value (bp, 1);
> >>>>>     TYPE_FINAL_P (expr) = (unsigned) bp_unpack_value (bp, 1);
> >>>>>     TYPE_CXX_ODR_P (expr) = (unsigned) bp_unpack_value (bp, 1);
> >>>>> +      TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY (expr) = (unsigned) bp_unpack_value (bp, 1);
> >>>>>   }
> >>>>> else if (TREE_CODE (expr) == ARRAY_TYPE)
> >>>>>   TYPE_NONALIASED_COMPONENT (expr) = (unsigned) bp_unpack_value (bp, 1);
> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-streamer-out.cc b/gcc/tree-streamer-out.cc
> >>>>> index d107229da5c..73e4b4e547c 100644
> >>>>> --- a/gcc/tree-streamer-out.cc
> >>>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-streamer-out.cc
> >>>>> @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ pack_ts_type_common_value_fields (struct bitpack_d *bp, tree expr)
> >>>>>     bp_pack_value (bp, flag_wpa && TYPE_CANONICAL (expr)
> >>>>> 			 ? TYPE_CXX_ODR_P (TYPE_CANONICAL (expr))
> >>>>> 			 : TYPE_CXX_ODR_P (expr), 1);
> >>>>> +      bp_pack_value (bp, TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY (expr), 1);
> >>>>>   }
> >>>>> else if (TREE_CODE (expr) == ARRAY_TYPE)
> >>>>>   bp_pack_value (bp, TYPE_NONALIASED_COMPONENT (expr), 1);
> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
> >>>>> index 92ac0e6a214..ab1cdc3dc85 100644
> >>>>> --- a/gcc/tree.h
> >>>>> +++ b/gcc/tree.h
> >>>>> @@ -778,6 +778,12 @@ extern void omp_clause_range_check_failed (const_tree, const char *, int,
> >>>>> #define TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P(NODE) \
> >>>>> (TYPE_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.no_named_args_stdarg_p)
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> +/* True if this RECORD_TYPE or UNION_TYPE includes a flexible array member
> >>>>> +   at the last field recursively.  */
> >>>>> +#define TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY(NODE) \
> >>>>> +  (TYPE_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.type_include_flexarray)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Please use RECORD_OR_UNION_CHECK.  
> >>> Okay. 
> >>>> The comment "at the last field"
> >>>> doesn't seem to match implementation? (at least not obviously)
> >>> The current implementation (in gcc/c/c-decl.cc) guarantees that it’s at the last field. (And recursively). 
> >>>> Given this is a generic header expanding on what a "flexible array member"
> >>>> is to the middle-end here would be good.  Especially the guarantees
> >>>> made when the bit is _not_ set (we've evaded that with DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY
> >>>> vs. DECL_FLEXARRAY).
> >>> 
> >>> The bit TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY default is FALSE, i.e, not including a flex array by default.
> >>> It’s only set to TRUE when the struct/union includes a flex array at the last field (and recursively). So, I think it should be correct. 
> >>> Let me know if I missed anything here.
> >> 
> >> See above - I was looking at the use (but I'm not familiar with that 
> >> code), and wondered how the change affects uses from other frontends.
> > 
> > Please see my explanation above, I think the default behavior from other FE should be kept correctly with this patch.
> > 
> > thanks.
> > 
> > Qing
> >> 
> >> Richard.
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman;
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-14  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-24 18:35 [V4][PATCH 0/2] Handle component_ref to a structure/union field including FAM for builtin_object_size Qing Zhao
2023-02-24 18:35 ` [v4][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field including C99 FAM [PR101832] Qing Zhao
2023-03-03  0:03   ` Qing Zhao
2023-03-09 12:20   ` Richard Biener
2023-03-09 16:11     ` Qing Zhao
2023-03-10  7:54       ` Richard Biener
2023-03-10 13:48         ` Qing Zhao
2023-03-13 22:42           ` Qing Zhao
2023-03-14  9:04             ` Richard Biener [this message]
2023-03-14 13:09               ` Qing Zhao
2023-02-24 18:35 ` [V4][PATCH 2/2] Update documentation to clarify a GCC extension Qing Zhao
2023-03-03  0:03   ` Qing Zhao
2023-03-12 23:14     ` Sandra Loosemore
2023-03-13 12:46       ` Qing Zhao
2023-03-15  3:26   ` Sandra Loosemore
2023-03-15 14:42     ` Qing Zhao
2023-03-03  0:02 ` [V4][PATCH 0/2] Handle component_ref to a structure/union field including FAM for builtin_object_size Qing Zhao
2023-03-08 18:45 ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2303140903160.18795@jbgna.fhfr.qr \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).