public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtins: Fix up ICE in inline_string_cmp [PR109258]
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:30:27 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2303240930220.18795@jbgna.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZB1oZcqg/ujxE+D+@tucnak>

On Fri, 24 Mar 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> The PR109086 r13-6690 inline_string_cmp change to
>       if (diff != result)
> 	emit_move_insn (result, diff);
> regressed
> FAIL: go.test/test/fixedbugs/bug207.go,  -O2 -g  (internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4224)
> The problem is the Go FE doesn't mark __builtin_memcmp as pure (I'll also
> send patch for that) and so result is const0_rtx when the call lost its lhs
> and the above move ICEs because moving something into const0_rtx is obviously
> invalid.
> I think it is better not to rely on all FEs having these *cmp functions
> pure anD DCE being performed.  The following patch just punts from the
> inline expansion in that case, so we just emit normal library call.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

OK.

> 2023-03-24  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR middle-end/109258
> 	* builtins.cc (inline_expand_builtin_bytecmp): Return NULL_RTX early
> 	if target == const0_rtx.
> 
> --- gcc/builtins.cc.jj	2023-03-23 10:00:58.308100548 +0100
> +++ gcc/builtins.cc	2023-03-23 11:05:38.308135309 +0100
> @@ -7178,8 +7178,8 @@ inline_expand_builtin_bytecmp (tree exp,
>    bool is_ncmp = (fcode == BUILT_IN_STRNCMP || fcode == BUILT_IN_MEMCMP);
>  
>    /* Do NOT apply this inlining expansion when optimizing for size or
> -     optimization level below 2.  */
> -  if (optimize < 2 || optimize_insn_for_size_p ())
> +     optimization level below 2 or if unused *cmp hasn't been DCEd.  */
> +  if (optimize < 2 || optimize_insn_for_size_p () || target == const0_rtx)
>      return NULL_RTX;
>  
>    gcc_checking_assert (fcode == BUILT_IN_STRCMP
> 
> 	Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman;
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-24  9:07 Jakub Jelinek
2023-03-24  9:08 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-03-24  9:30 ` Richard Biener [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2303240930220.18795@jbgna.fhfr.qr \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).