From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D177385773C for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:17:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9D177385773C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6772122911; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:17:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1689837422; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X7Lc3D/nihPAmrlqqRM+bJkb2qjzChvP+Y/OABw0wJE=; b=0u9JWPrOhYf+kXQH7CINQ91XOcMf6dHSlXzqQs2LozB35HHLiYnWPdqN4NXwNJ9fslI1FH OfVD80mghKByp1kdnMMKpbVewSF9c+IM8N8/LT2iW6iTQCxeRiorPZ9P6YQEbgX0DQ1G53 4CehlrcDMHEH5eR5U30m/qN/4sVo5Ms= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1689837422; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X7Lc3D/nihPAmrlqqRM+bJkb2qjzChvP+Y/OABw0wJE=; b=31NbTOwjiClok36l/bfO96arP8vmP+iJOTsj02fOO94KRyiQWzyPTtonpP4fdjNvS3PTa1 szRGr6QJ4ZbTVuAQ== Received: from wotan.suse.de (wotan.suse.de [10.160.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C3702C143; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:17:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Richard Biener To: FX Coudert cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jakub Jelinek , Joseph Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add __builtin_iseqsig() In-Reply-To: <4AEED749-8689-4272-898F-D8BB23073B60@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <127A04DF-0BC1-40B4-956A-B22C39F97BF9@gmail.com> <3FD18835-D09C-4073-B23F-DD1038D4D0AC@gmail.com> <43356B54-A446-450A-80F8-620120ED1FCC@gmail.com> <5D59385E-B643-42CE-809E-D52A1F4FE1D3@gmail.com> <4AEED749-8689-4272-898F-D8BB23073B60@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (LSU 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, FX Coudert wrote: > 6 weeks later, I?d like to ask a global maintainer to review this. > The idea was okay?ed previously by Joseph Myers, but he asked for testing of both the quiet and signalling NaN cases, which is now done. OK. Thanks, Richard. > FX > > > > Le 6 juin 2023 ? 20:15, FX Coudert a ?crit : > > > > Hi, > > > > (It took me a while to get back to this.) > > > > This is a new and improved version of the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602932.html > > It addresses the comment from Joseph that FE_INVALID should really be tested in the case of both quiet and signaling NaNs, which is now done systematically. > > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > > OK to commit? > > > > FX > > > -- Richard Biener SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)