From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/12] phiopt: Fix phiopt ICE on vops [PR102989]
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 06:52:07 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2308100652030.12935@jbgna.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZNP0pQWqgO2eUZNL@tucnak>
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 01:06:22PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > That was my next thought, returning NULL from
> > single_non_singleton_phi_for_edges if it would return a virtual OP
> > might be better even.
> > Either version of these patches are ok with me (though I am not the
> > maintainer here).
>
> In patch form that would be (but so far untested):
LGTM
> 2023-08-09 <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c/102989
> * tree-ssa-phiopt.cc (single_non_singleton_phi_for_edges): Never
> return virtual phis and return NULL if there is a virtual phi
> where the arguments from E0 and E1 edges aren't equal.
>
> --- gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc.jj 2023-08-09 22:08:07.974563266 +0200
> +++ gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc 2023-08-09 22:11:37.291517911 +0200
> @@ -63,7 +63,13 @@ single_non_singleton_phi_for_edges (gimp
> gimple_stmt_iterator i;
> gphi *phi = NULL;
> if (gimple_seq_singleton_p (seq))
> - return as_a <gphi *> (gsi_stmt (gsi_start (seq)));
> + {
> + phi = as_a <gphi *> (gsi_stmt (gsi_start (seq)));
> + /* Never return virtual phis. */
> + if (virtual_operand_p (gimple_phi_result (phi)))
> + return NULL;
> + return phi;
> + }
> for (i = gsi_start (seq); !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (&i))
> {
> gphi *p = as_a <gphi *> (gsi_stmt (i));
> @@ -72,6 +78,10 @@ single_non_singleton_phi_for_edges (gimp
> gimple_phi_arg_def (p, e1->dest_idx)))
> continue;
>
> + /* Punt on virtual phis with different arguments from the edges. */
> + if (virtual_operand_p (gimple_phi_result (p)))
> + return NULL;
> +
> /* If we already have a PHI that has the two edge arguments are
> different, then return it is not a singleton for these PHIs. */
> if (phi)
>
>
> Jakub
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 18:17 Jakub Jelinek
2023-08-09 18:27 ` Andrew Pinski
2023-08-09 20:00 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-08-09 20:06 ` Andrew Pinski
2023-08-09 20:18 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-08-10 6:52 ` Richard Biener [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2308100652030.12935@jbgna.fhfr.qr \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).