From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST vectorization
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:58:50 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2308100750540.12935@jbgna.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810074909.492039-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
>
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
>
> This patch add support live vectorization by VEC_EXTRACT for LEN loop control.
>
> Consider this following case:
>
> #include <stdint.h>
>
> #define EXTRACT_LAST(TYPE) \
> TYPE __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) \
> test_##TYPE (TYPE *x, int n, TYPE value) \
> { \
> TYPE last; \
> for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) \
> { \
> last = x[j]; \
> x[j] = last * value; \
> } \
> return last; \
> }
>
> #define TEST_ALL(T) \
> T (uint8_t) \
>
> TEST_ALL (EXTRACT_LAST)
>
> ARM SVE IR:
>
> Preheader:
> max_mask_34 = .WHILE_ULT (0, bnd.5_6, { 0, ... });
>
> Loop:
> ...
> # loop_mask_22 = PHI <next_mask_35(4), max_mask_34(3)>
> ...
> vect_last_12.8_23 = .MASK_LOAD (_7, 8B, loop_mask_22);
> vect__4.9_27 = vect_last_12.8_23 * vect_cst__26;
> .MASK_STORE (_7, 8B, loop_mask_22, vect__4.9_27);
> ...
> next_mask_35 = .WHILE_ULT (_1, bnd.5_6, { 0, ... });
> ...
>
> Epilogue:
> _25 = .EXTRACT_LAST (loop_mask_22, vect_last_12.8_23);
>
> For RVV since we prefer len in loop control, after this patch for RVV:
>
> Loop:
> ...
> loop_len_22 = SELECT_VL;
> vect_last_12.8_23 = .MASK_LOAD (_7, 8B, loop_len_22);
> vect__4.9_27 = vect_last_12.8_23 * vect_cst__26;
> .MASK_STORE (_7, 8B, loop_len_22, vect__4.9_27);
> ...
>
> Epilogue:
> _25 = .VEC_EXTRACT (loop_len_22 - 1 - bias, vect_last_12.8_23);
>
> Details of this approach:
>
> 1. Step 1 - Add 'vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p' to enable live vectorization
> for LEN loop control.
>
> This function we check whether target support:
> - Use LEN as the loop control.
> - Support VEC_EXTRACT optab.
>
> 2. Step 2 - Record LEN for loop control if 'vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p' is true.
>
> 3. Step 3 - Gerenate VEC_EXTRACT (v, LEN - 1 - BIAS).
>
> NOTE: This patch set 'vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true;' since the original STMT is a simple
> assignment wheras VEC_EXTRACT is neither pure nor const function according to internal-fn.def:
>
> DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (VEC_EXTRACT, 0, vec_extract, vec_extract)
>
> If we don't set 'vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa' as true, it will cause ICE in:
>
> if (need_ssa_update_p (cfun))
> {
> gcc_assert (loop_vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa); ----> Report assertion fail here.
> fun->gimple_df->ssa_renaming_needed = false;
> todo |= TODO_update_ssa_only_virtuals;
> }
>
> I saw there are 2 places set 'vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa' as true:
>
> - The one is in 'vectorizable_simd_clone_call':
>
> /* When the original call is pure or const but the SIMD ABI dictates
> an aggregate return we will have to use a virtual definition and
> in a loop eventually even need to add a virtual PHI. That's
> not straight-forward so allow to fix this up via renaming. */
> if (gimple_call_lhs (stmt)
> && !gimple_vdef (stmt)
> && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (bestn->decl))) == ARRAY_TYPE)
> vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true;
>
> - The other is in 'vectorizable_load':
>
> if (memory_access_type == VMAT_LOAD_STORE_LANES)
> vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true;
>
> It seems that they are the same reason as me doing in 'vectorizable_live_operation'.
> Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
You should always manually update things. Did you verify the mask
case is handled by this?
There's the odd
if (stmts)
{
gimple_stmt_iterator exit_gsi = gsi_after_labels (exit_bb);
gsi_insert_seq_before (&exit_gsi, stmts, GSI_SAME_STMT);
/* Remove existing phi from lhs and create one copy from
new_tree. */
tree lhs_phi = NULL_TREE;
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
for (gsi = gsi_start_phis (exit_bb);
!gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
{
gimple *phi = gsi_stmt (gsi);
if ((gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, 0) == lhs))
{
remove_phi_node (&gsi, false);
lhs_phi = gimple_phi_result (phi);
gimple *copy = gimple_build_assign (lhs_phi, new_tree);
gsi_insert_before (&exit_gsi, copy, GSI_SAME_STMT);
break;
}
}
code but I don't think it will create new LC PHIs for the mask, instead
it will break LC SSA as well by removing a PHI?
I guess as a temporary thing your approach is OK but we shouldn't
add these as part of new code - it's supposed to handle legacy
cases that we didn't fixup yet.
Richard.
> Bootstrap and Regression on X86 passed.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p): New function.
> (vectorizable_live_operation): Add loop LEN control.
>
> ---
> gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> index 00058c3c13e..208918f53fb 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> @@ -8964,6 +8964,24 @@ vect_can_vectorize_without_simd_p (code_helper code)
> && vect_can_vectorize_without_simd_p (tree_code (code)));
> }
>
> +/* Return true if target supports extract last vectorization with LEN. */
> +
> +static bool
> +vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p (tree vectype)
> +{
> + /* Return false if target doesn't support LEN in loop control. */
> + machine_mode vmode;
> + if (!get_len_load_store_mode (TYPE_MODE (vectype), true).exists (&vmode)
> + || !get_len_load_store_mode (TYPE_MODE (vectype), false).exists (&vmode))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Target need to support VEC_EXTRACT to extract the last active element. */
> + return convert_optab_handler (vec_extract_optab,
> + TYPE_MODE (vectype),
> + TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (vectype)))
> + != CODE_FOR_nothing;
> +}
> +
> /* Create vector init for vectorized iv. */
> static tree
> vect_create_nonlinear_iv_init (gimple_seq* stmts, tree init_expr,
> @@ -10282,7 +10300,8 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
> if (loop_vinfo && LOOP_VINFO_CAN_USE_PARTIAL_VECTORS_P (loop_vinfo))
> {
> if (!direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_EXTRACT_LAST, vectype,
> - OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> + OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED)
> + && !vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p (vectype))
> {
> if (dump_enabled_p ())
> dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> @@ -10311,9 +10330,14 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
> else
> {
> gcc_assert (ncopies == 1 && !slp_node);
> - vect_record_loop_mask (loop_vinfo,
> - &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo),
> - 1, vectype, NULL);
> + if (vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p (vectype))
> + vect_record_loop_len (loop_vinfo,
> + &LOOP_VINFO_LENS (loop_vinfo),
> + 1, vectype, 1);
> + else
> + vect_record_loop_mask (loop_vinfo,
> + &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo),
> + 1, vectype, NULL);
> }
> }
> /* ??? Enable for loop costing as well. */
> @@ -10339,7 +10363,9 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
> gimple *vec_stmt;
> if (slp_node)
> {
> - gcc_assert (!loop_vinfo || !LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo));
> + gcc_assert (!loop_vinfo
> + || (!LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo)
> + && !LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_WITH_LENGTH_P (loop_vinfo)));
>
> /* Get the correct slp vectorized stmt. */
> vec_lhs = SLP_TREE_VEC_DEFS (slp_node)[vec_entry];
> @@ -10383,7 +10409,43 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
>
> gimple_seq stmts = NULL;
> tree new_tree;
> - if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo))
> + if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_WITH_LENGTH_P (loop_vinfo))
> + {
> + /* Emit:
> +
> + SCALAR_RES = VEC_EXTRACT <VEC_LHS, LEN - BIAS - 1>
> +
> + where VEC_LHS is the vectorized live-out result and MASK is
> + the loop mask for the final iteration. */
> + gcc_assert (ncopies == 1 && !slp_node);
> + tree scalar_type = TREE_TYPE (STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (stmt_info));
> + tree len
> + = vect_get_loop_len (loop_vinfo, gsi, &LOOP_VINFO_LENS (loop_vinfo),
> + 1, vectype, 0, 0);
> +
> + /* BIAS + 1. */
> + signed char biasval = LOOP_VINFO_PARTIAL_LOAD_STORE_BIAS (loop_vinfo);
> + tree bias_one
> + = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR, build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (len), biasval),
> + build_one_cst (TREE_TYPE (len)));
> +
> + /* LAST_INDEX = LEN - (BIAS + 1). */
> + tree last_index
> + = gimple_build (&stmts, MINUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (len), len, bias_one);
> +
> + tree scalar_res = gimple_build (&stmts, CFN_VEC_EXTRACT, scalar_type,
> + vec_lhs_phi, last_index);
> +
> + /* Convert the extracted vector element to the scalar type. */
> + new_tree = gimple_convert (&stmts, lhs_type, scalar_res);
> + /* When the original stmt is an assignment but VEC_EXTRACT is not pure
> + or const since it may return a memory result. We will have to use
> + a virtual definition and in a loop eventually even need to add a
> + virtual PHI. That's not straight-forward so allow to fix this up
> + via renaming. */
> + vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true;
> + }
> + else if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo))
> {
> /* Emit:
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 7:49 juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10 7:58 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2023-08-10 8:15 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10 8:35 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10 11:09 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-10 11:38 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10 12:14 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-10 12:24 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10 12:33 ` Robin Dapp
2023-08-10 12:35 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2308100750540.12935@jbgna.fhfr.qr \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).