public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 "richard.sandiford" <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST vectorization
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:09:59 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2308101109300.12935@jbgna.fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC7CA8C7007504D8+2023081016353972852118@rivai.ai>

On Thu, 10 Aug 2023, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:

> >> I guess as a temporary thing your approach is OK but we shouldn't
> >> add these as part of new code - it's supposed to handle legacy
> >> cases that we didn't fixup yet.
> 
> Do you mean we need to fix LC SSA PHI flow so that we don't need to 
> set vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true ?
> 
> After it's fixed then this patch with removing 'vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true' is ok for trunk, am I right?

I want to know why we don't need this for SVE fully masked loops.  What
inserts the required LC SSA PHI in that case?

> Thanks.
> 
> 
> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
>  
> From: Richard Biener
> Date: 2023-08-10 15:58
> To: Ju-Zhe Zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Support loop len control on EXTRACT_LAST vectorization
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:
>  
> > From: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
> > 
> > Hi, Richard and Richi.
> > 
> > This patch add support live vectorization by VEC_EXTRACT for LEN loop control.
> > 
> > Consider this following case:
> > 
> > #include <stdint.h>
> > 
> > #define EXTRACT_LAST(TYPE) \
> >   TYPE __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) \
> >   test_##TYPE (TYPE *x, int n, TYPE value) \
> >   { \
> >     TYPE last; \
> >     for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) \
> >       { \
> > last = x[j]; \
> > x[j] = last * value; \
> >       } \
> >     return last; \
> >   }
> > 
> > #define TEST_ALL(T) \
> >   T (uint8_t) \
> > 
> > TEST_ALL (EXTRACT_LAST)
> > 
> > ARM SVE IR:
> > 
> > Preheader:
> >   max_mask_34 = .WHILE_ULT (0, bnd.5_6, { 0, ... });
> > 
> > Loop:
> >   ...
> >   # loop_mask_22 = PHI <next_mask_35(4), max_mask_34(3)>
> >   ...
> >   vect_last_12.8_23 = .MASK_LOAD (_7, 8B, loop_mask_22);
> >   vect__4.9_27 = vect_last_12.8_23 * vect_cst__26;
> >   .MASK_STORE (_7, 8B, loop_mask_22, vect__4.9_27);
> >   ...
> >   next_mask_35 = .WHILE_ULT (_1, bnd.5_6, { 0, ... });
> >   ...
> > 
> > Epilogue:
> >   _25 = .EXTRACT_LAST (loop_mask_22, vect_last_12.8_23);
> > 
> > For RVV since we prefer len in loop control, after this patch for RVV:
> > 
> > Loop:
> >   ...
> >   loop_len_22 = SELECT_VL;
> >   vect_last_12.8_23 = .MASK_LOAD (_7, 8B, loop_len_22);
> >   vect__4.9_27 = vect_last_12.8_23 * vect_cst__26;
> >   .MASK_STORE (_7, 8B, loop_len_22, vect__4.9_27);
> >   ...
> > 
> > Epilogue:
> >   _25 = .VEC_EXTRACT (loop_len_22 - 1 - bias, vect_last_12.8_23);
> > 
> > Details of this approach:
> > 
> > 1. Step 1 - Add 'vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p'  to enable live vectorization
> >             for LEN loop control.
> >    
> >    This function we check whether target support:
> >     - Use LEN as the loop control.
> >     - Support VEC_EXTRACT optab.
> > 
> > 2. Step 2 - Record LEN for loop control if 'vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p' is true.
> > 
> > 3. Step 3 - Gerenate VEC_EXTRACT (v, LEN - 1 - BIAS).
> > 
> > NOTE: This patch set 'vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true;' since the original STMT is a simple
> >       assignment wheras VEC_EXTRACT is neither pure nor const function according to internal-fn.def:
> > 
> >       DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (VEC_EXTRACT, 0, vec_extract, vec_extract)
> > 
> >       If we don't set 'vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa' as true, it will cause ICE in:
> > 
> >         if (need_ssa_update_p (cfun))
> >           {
> >             gcc_assert (loop_vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa);  ----> Report assertion fail here.
> >             fun->gimple_df->ssa_renaming_needed = false;
> >             todo |= TODO_update_ssa_only_virtuals;
> >           }
> >       
> >       I saw there are 2 places set 'vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa' as true:
> >         
> > - The one is in 'vectorizable_simd_clone_call':
> > 
> > /* When the original call is pure or const but the SIMD ABI dictates
> > an aggregate return we will have to use a virtual definition and
> > in a loop eventually even need to add a virtual PHI.  That's
> > not straight-forward so allow to fix this up via renaming.  */
> >       if (gimple_call_lhs (stmt)
> >   && !gimple_vdef (stmt)
> >   && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (bestn->decl))) == ARRAY_TYPE)
> > vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true;
> >        
> >        - The other is in 'vectorizable_load':
> >        
> >         if (memory_access_type == VMAT_LOAD_STORE_LANES)
> >   vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true;
> > 
> >       It seems that they are the same reason as me doing in 'vectorizable_live_operation'.
> >       Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
>  
> You should always manually update things.  Did you verify the mask
> case is handled by this?
>  
> There's the odd
>  
>       if (stmts)
>         {
>           gimple_stmt_iterator exit_gsi = gsi_after_labels (exit_bb);
>           gsi_insert_seq_before (&exit_gsi, stmts, GSI_SAME_STMT);
>  
>           /* Remove existing phi from lhs and create one copy from 
> new_tree.  */
>           tree lhs_phi = NULL_TREE;
>           gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
>           for (gsi = gsi_start_phis (exit_bb);
>                !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
>             {
>               gimple *phi = gsi_stmt (gsi);
>               if ((gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, 0) == lhs))
>                 {
>                   remove_phi_node (&gsi, false);
>                   lhs_phi = gimple_phi_result (phi);
>                   gimple *copy = gimple_build_assign (lhs_phi, new_tree);
>                   gsi_insert_before (&exit_gsi, copy, GSI_SAME_STMT);
>                   break;
>                 }
>             }
>  
> code but I don't think it will create new LC PHIs for the mask, instead
> it will break LC SSA as well by removing a PHI?
>  
> I guess as a temporary thing your approach is OK but we shouldn't
> add these as part of new code - it's supposed to handle legacy
> cases that we didn't fixup yet.
>  
> Richard.
>  
>  
>  
> >       Bootstrap and Regression on X86 passed.
> > 
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >         * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p): New function.
> >         (vectorizable_live_operation): Add loop LEN control.
> > 
> > ---
> >  gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> > index 00058c3c13e..208918f53fb 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> > @@ -8964,6 +8964,24 @@ vect_can_vectorize_without_simd_p (code_helper code)
> >    && vect_can_vectorize_without_simd_p (tree_code (code)));
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* Return true if target supports extract last vectorization with LEN.  */
> > +
> > +static bool
> > +vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p (tree vectype)
> > +{
> > +  /* Return false if target doesn't support LEN in loop control.  */
> > +  machine_mode vmode;
> > +  if (!get_len_load_store_mode (TYPE_MODE (vectype), true).exists (&vmode)
> > +      || !get_len_load_store_mode (TYPE_MODE (vectype), false).exists (&vmode))
> > +    return false;
> > +
> > +  /* Target need to support VEC_EXTRACT to extract the last active element.  */
> > +  return convert_optab_handler (vec_extract_optab,
> > + TYPE_MODE (vectype),
> > + TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (vectype)))
> > + != CODE_FOR_nothing;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Create vector init for vectorized iv.  */
> >  static tree
> >  vect_create_nonlinear_iv_init (gimple_seq* stmts, tree init_expr,
> > @@ -10282,7 +10300,8 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
> >        if (loop_vinfo && LOOP_VINFO_CAN_USE_PARTIAL_VECTORS_P (loop_vinfo))
> >  {
> >    if (!direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_EXTRACT_LAST, vectype,
> > -        OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> > +        OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED)
> > +       && !vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p (vectype))
> >      {
> >        if (dump_enabled_p ())
> >  dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> > @@ -10311,9 +10330,14 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
> >    else
> >      {
> >        gcc_assert (ncopies == 1 && !slp_node);
> > -       vect_record_loop_mask (loop_vinfo,
> > -      &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo),
> > -      1, vectype, NULL);
> > +       if (vect_can_vectorize_extract_last_with_len_p (vectype))
> > + vect_record_loop_len (loop_vinfo,
> > +       &LOOP_VINFO_LENS (loop_vinfo),
> > +       1, vectype, 1);
> > +       else
> > + vect_record_loop_mask (loop_vinfo,
> > +        &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo),
> > +        1, vectype, NULL);
> >      }
> >  }
> >        /* ???  Enable for loop costing as well.  */
> > @@ -10339,7 +10363,9 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
> >    gimple *vec_stmt;
> >    if (slp_node)
> >      {
> > -      gcc_assert (!loop_vinfo || !LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo));
> > +      gcc_assert (!loop_vinfo
> > +   || (!LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo)
> > +       && !LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_WITH_LENGTH_P (loop_vinfo)));
> >  
> >        /* Get the correct slp vectorized stmt.  */
> >        vec_lhs = SLP_TREE_VEC_DEFS (slp_node)[vec_entry];
> > @@ -10383,7 +10409,43 @@ vectorizable_live_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
> >  
> >        gimple_seq stmts = NULL;
> >        tree new_tree;
> > -      if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo))
> > +      if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_WITH_LENGTH_P (loop_vinfo))
> > + {
> > +   /* Emit:
> > +
> > +        SCALAR_RES = VEC_EXTRACT <VEC_LHS, LEN - BIAS - 1>
> > +
> > +      where VEC_LHS is the vectorized live-out result and MASK is
> > +      the loop mask for the final iteration.  */
> > +   gcc_assert (ncopies == 1 && !slp_node);
> > +   tree scalar_type = TREE_TYPE (STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (stmt_info));
> > +   tree len
> > +     = vect_get_loop_len (loop_vinfo, gsi, &LOOP_VINFO_LENS (loop_vinfo),
> > + 1, vectype, 0, 0);
> > +
> > +   /* BIAS + 1.  */
> > +   signed char biasval = LOOP_VINFO_PARTIAL_LOAD_STORE_BIAS (loop_vinfo);
> > +   tree bias_one
> > +     = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR, build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (len), biasval),
> > +   build_one_cst (TREE_TYPE (len)));
> > +
> > +   /* LAST_INDEX = LEN - (BIAS + 1).  */
> > +   tree last_index
> > +     = gimple_build (&stmts, MINUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (len), len, bias_one);
> > +
> > +   tree scalar_res = gimple_build (&stmts, CFN_VEC_EXTRACT, scalar_type,
> > +   vec_lhs_phi, last_index);
> > +
> > +   /* Convert the extracted vector element to the scalar type.  */
> > +   new_tree = gimple_convert (&stmts, lhs_type, scalar_res);
> > +   /* When the original stmt is an assignment but VEC_EXTRACT is not pure
> > +      or const since it may return a memory result.  We will have to use
> > +      a virtual definition and in a loop eventually even need to add a
> > +      virtual PHI. That's not straight-forward so allow to fix this up
> > +      via renaming.  */
> > +   vinfo->any_known_not_updated_vssa = true;
> > + }
> > +      else if (LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo))
> >  {
> >    /* Emit:
> >  
> > 
>  
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-10 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-10  7:49 juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10  7:58 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-10  8:15   ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10  8:35   ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10 11:09     ` Richard Biener [this message]
2023-08-10 11:38       ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10 12:14         ` Richard Biener
2023-08-10 12:24           ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-10 12:33           ` Robin Dapp
2023-08-10 12:35             ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2308101109300.12935@jbgna.fhfr.qr \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).