Re: [PATCH] RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of bb-slp-68.c for RVV

[Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>]

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:

> Like comment said, this test failed on 64 bytes vector.
> Both RVV and GCN has 64 bytes vector.
> 
> So it's more reasonable to use vect512.

OK

> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c: Use vect512.
> 
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
> index e7573a14933..2dd3d8ee90c 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
> @@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ void foo ()
>  
>  /* We want to have the store group split into 4, 2, 4 when using 32byte vectors.
>     Unfortunately it does not work when 64-byte vectors are available.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail amdgcn-*-* } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail vect512 } } } */
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)