From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitint: Don't move debug stmts from before returns_twice calls [PR114628]
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 08:49:57 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <oq812r25-7rsr-3sqs-p90r-o7q0qnqs3p7n@fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhTiNYvJGUSLmQZf@tucnak>
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Debug stmts are allowed by the verifier before the returns_twice calls.
Huh, interesting ;)
> More importantly, they don't have a lhs, so the current handling of
> arg_stmts statements to force them on the edges ICEs.
>
> The following patch just keeps them where they were before.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
Richard.
> 2024-04-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR middle-end/114628
> * gimple-lower-bitint.cc (gimple_lower_bitint): Keep debug stmts
> before returns_twice calls as is, don't push them into arg_stmts
> vector/move to edges.
>
> * gcc.dg/bitint-105.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc.jj 2024-04-04 10:46:52.698026863 +0200
> +++ gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc 2024-04-08 15:42:19.719892644 +0200
> @@ -7172,8 +7172,13 @@ gimple_lower_bitint (void)
> gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_after_labels (gimple_bb (stmt));
> while (gsi_stmt (gsi) != stmt)
> {
> - arg_stmts.safe_push (gsi_stmt (gsi));
> - gsi_remove (&gsi, false);
> + if (is_gimple_debug (gsi_stmt (gsi)))
> + gsi_next (&gsi);
> + else
> + {
> + arg_stmts.safe_push (gsi_stmt (gsi));
> + gsi_remove (&gsi, false);
> + }
> }
> gimple *g;
> basic_block bb = NULL;
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-105.c.jj 2024-04-08 16:00:07.843630530 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-105.c 2024-04-08 15:49:28.687175492 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +/* PR middle-end/114628 */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target bitint } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -g" } */
> +
> +int foo (int);
> +#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 129
> +__attribute__((returns_twice)) int bar (_BitInt(129) x);
> +
> +void
> +baz (int x, _BitInt(129) y)
> +{
> + void *q[] = { &&l1, &&l2 };
> +l2:
> + x = foo (foo (3));
> + bar (y);
> + goto *q[x & 1];
> +l1:;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +qux (int x, _BitInt(129) y)
> +{
> + void *q[] = { &&l1, &&l2 };
> +l2:
> + x = foo (foo (3));
> + bar (y);
> +l1:;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> Jakub
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-09 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-09 6:37 Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-09 6:49 ` Richard Biener [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=oq812r25-7rsr-3sqs-p90r-o7q0qnqs3p7n@fhfr.qr \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).