From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123108 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2015 18:02:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 121607 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2015 18:02:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:02:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E0E2BC8C0; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freie.home (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6OI2E0f018794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:02:15 -0400 Received: from livre.home (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by freie.home (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t6OI1wqg010512; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:01:58 -0300 From: Alexandre Oliva To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Richard Biener , Jeff Law , GCC Patches , Christophe Lyon , David Edelsohn , Eric Botcazou Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand References: <20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org> (Segher Boessenkool's message of "Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:31:12 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02096.txt.bz2 On Jul 23, 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:14PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> Yeah. Thanks, I've tested it with this change, and I'm now checking >> this in (full patch first; adjusted incremental patch at the end): > Unfortunately it causes about a thousand test fails on powerpc64-linux > (at least, it seems to be this patch, I haven't actually checked). Yeah, the backtrace suggests very strongly that it's my patch. Apologies for the breakage. I'm looking into it right now. > I have the full testsuite logs if you want them. Preprocessed testcases would probably help more than the logs, but at least one of the testcases you mentioned doesn't require any libraries, so I'm going to start with them. Then, I'll find some ppc64-linux-gnu box in the build farm and run some bootstrap and regression testing there. -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer