From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31162 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2015 21:35:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31153 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jul 2015 21:35:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:35:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FB6233EACE; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freie.home (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6RLMo5C031192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:22:53 -0400 Received: from livre.home (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by freie.home (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t6RLMh4L004898; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:22:43 -0300 From: Alexandre Oliva To: David Edelsohn Cc: Jeff Law , Segher Boessenkool , Richard Biener , GCC Patches , Christophe Lyon , Eric Botcazou , "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand References: <20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 22:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (David Edelsohn's message of "Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:29:10 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02302.txt.bz2 On Jul 24, 2015, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Jul 23, 2015, David Edelsohn wrote: >> >>> I request that this patch be reverted (again). >> >> Might I kindly ask you to please do so for me. I've just found out >> that, after yesterday's memory upgrade on my local build machine, the >> filesystem that I normally use for GCC development got corrupted, and I >> don't want to mess with it before running an fsck which will take me a >> while. > I have reverted the patch. Thank you very much. Long story short, the filesystem got corrupted beyond repair before I realized something was wrong, so I spend my weekend backing up the bits I still could and recreating it all from scratch. *fun* :-/ I even ran memtest before booting up, but everything was fine in the single-threaded tests it runs by default. It was only with all cores actively using memory intensely that something overheated (memory modules? chipset? cpu? no clue) and started randomly corrupting bits. So, I'm now back at lower memory clock speeds, and everything appears to be rock solid again. Phew! So, I'm back to debugging the newly-reported problems and thinking how much further I should extend testing coverage so that the next round doesn't have to be reverted again ;-) Thanks again, -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer