From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3497 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2004 18:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3457 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2004 18:05:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2004 18:05:08 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6FI56e1003912; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:05:06 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6FI56028778; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:05:06 -0400 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (vpn50-10.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.10]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6FI55oI020861; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:05:05 -0400 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [127.0.0.1]) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6FI54S1022056; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:05:04 -0300 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id i6FI53xc022053; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:05:03 -0300 To: Richard Sandiford Cc: Kazu Hirata , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: add h8sx support to h8300 References: <20040621.102356.74724063.kazu@cs.umass.edu> <87fz83f456.fsf@redhat.com> <87zn6aevpa.fsf@redhat.com> <873c42e8rb.fsf@redhat.com> <87r7rh8hx8.fsf@redhat.com> <874qobvz2a.fsf@redhat.com> <874qoawesn.fsf@redhat.com> <87658pd9yn.fsf@redhat.com> <874qo9pw5v.fsf@redhat.com> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: Red Hat Global Engineering Services Compiler Team Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 22:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <874qo9pw5v.fsf@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg01564.txt.bz2 On Jul 15, 2004, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Sorry, I'm getting my 'H's mixed up... Glad I'm not the only one who does that :-) > And the same thing was true in the old code too. The fact that > {HARD_,}FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM were 6 did not cause regs_ever_live[6] > to be true until we knew for certain that the frame pointer couldn't > be eliminated. Aha, I didn't realize that. No objections to the patch, then. It's just as broken as my alternate implementation, and if it generates better code when it works, fine with me. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}