From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5566 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2020 01:11:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5557 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2020 01:11:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=portion X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 01:11:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A72116324; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:11:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HtPwoa9lIKk9; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:11:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from free.home (tron.gnat.com [IPv6:2620:20:4000:0:46a8:42ff:fe0e:e294]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59BC71162F7; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:11:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from livre.home (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by free.home (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00M1B49f1646637 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 22:11:04 -0300 From: Alexandre Oliva To: Richard Biener Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, ebotcazou@adacore.com, joseph@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: drop -aux{dir,base}, revamp -dump{dir,base} References: Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 01:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Richard Biener's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:32:03 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg01397.txt.bz2 On Jan 20, 2020, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> Here it is, at last, regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok to install? > I'm hesitant to approve it now since we're in stage4 and been too > permissive already. So ... > OK for GCC 11. Thanks, that sounds quite reasonable. The patch itself is not very invasive, but the behavior changes could probably use a longer time of pre-release community use before hitting a release. I'm queuing it up for when we get to stage 1. I suppose I might go ahead and install the libiberty follow-up patch approved by Joseph, and squash the lto-wrapper portion into the larger patch. Please let me know in case you think the libiberty change to preserve empty arguments should also be deferred to 11. -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter he/him https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo Free Software Evangelist Stallman was right, but he's left :( GNU Toolchain Engineer FSMatrix: It was he who freed the first of us FSF & FSFLA board member The Savior shall return (true);