On Jul 24, 2015, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 23, 2015, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983
>> 
>> My test logs with the patch have:
>> 
>> PASS: c-c++-common/dfp/func-vararg-dfp.c execution test
>> 
>> so I think this one is not caused by the PR64164 patch.

> I double checked.  r226113 failed and r226112 passed.

Weird.  Here's the asm I got, after re-running the command used to
compiled this test with -save-temps.  I checked that the produced
executable is an ELF32 executable, and that it completes execution
successfully.

How does it compare to yours?