From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1554 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2007 06:56:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 1546 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2007 06:56:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:56:19 +0100 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3K6uHcR001469; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:56:17 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3K6uGWv028034; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:56:16 -0400 Received: from free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (vpn-14-124.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.124]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3K6uEmU020774; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:56:15 -0400 Received: from free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3K6uA3a000810; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:56:10 -0300 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.14.1/8.13.5/Submit) id l3K6u9qt000809; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:56:09 -0300 To: Bernd Schmidt Cc: Daniel Berlin , GCC Patches , Diego Novillo , Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: Reload bug & SRA oddness References: <462807D3.7010106@t-online.de> <4aca3dc20704192019u4458386dicf5078a9190381a9@mail.gmail.com> <46283931.2090207@t-online.de> From: Alexandre Oliva Errors-To: aoliva@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <46283931.2090207@t-online.de> (Bernd Schmidt's message of "Fri\, 20 Apr 2007 05\:53\:21 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg01255.txt.bz2 On Apr 20, 2007, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Alex, any particular reason why you made this change in > the first place? Sure. IIRC, without it, we'd initialize scalarized fields, fail to copy them into the unscalarized variable, then block-copy the entire variable with outdated contents. I remember this was one of the last fixes I added to the patch, so taking it out you're certainly going to observe regressions on x86_64-linux-gnu and/or i686-linux-gnu. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}