From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap-debug-lean + flags in producer vs compare
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 01:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ortvy11xi6.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32aa3ad6-73d0-612c-10a9-79436a721a5d@redhat.com> (Jeff Law's message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2017 17:12:59 -0600")
On Oct 30, 2017, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> I'd support either or both. Your call.
Thanks. I think I'll go with both, then.
Ok to install as follows? (edited the comments and added a ChangeLog)
Use compare-debug for bootstrap-debug-lean to ignore != DW_AT_producer
Unlike bootstrap-debug, bootstrap-debug-lean used to pass compare using
the traditional compare command, because it compiled both stage2 and
stage3 with options that used to generate identical output
(-fcompare-debug= in stage2 vs -fcompare-debug in stage3).
Since we started adding relevant command-line flags to DW_AT_producer,
this is no longer the case, and stages 2 and 3 object files that differ
in nothing but the DW_AT_producer strings.
-fcompare-debug is short for -fcompare-debug=-gtoggle, so stage3
compiles twice, once with the normal options, once with toggled -g, to
then compare the temporary final dumps. When enabled, both compilations
get from the driver an additional -frandom-seed flag (if none is given
explicitly).
-fcompare-debug= is short for -fno-compare-debug, disabling the second
compilation.
The difference between the DW_AT_producer lines are the different
-fcompare-debug flags, and the presence of the -frandom-seed flag in the
stage3 compilation.
It is easy and sensible enough to filter the -fcompare-debug flags out
of the DW_AT_producer string. This option should never affect the
compilation output, it just determines whether or not to perform an
additional compilation that should produce the same executable output.
However, dropping -frandom-seed is not quite correct, in that it might
have other consequences on the compilation. So, it makes little sense
to make the effort to drop it when it's implicit; for those comparing
compiler output differences, it might even hint at what causes, and
could fix, difficult to explain differences, namely, explicitly
supplying -frandom-seed options.
They don't seem to matter for compiler bootstraps, though, at least
for now, so we can safely refrain from issuing -frandom-seed (or maybe
we already issue it where needed :-), and then, for
bootstrap-debug-lean, use the compare-debug script, that strips out
debug information before comparing the object files.
for config/ChangeLog
* bootstrap-debug-lean.mk (do-compare): Use the
contrib/compare-debug script.
for gcc/ChangeLog
* dwarf2out.c (gen_producer_string): Discard
OPT_fcompare_debug.
---
config/bootstrap-debug-lean.mk | 1 +
gcc/dwarf2out.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/config/bootstrap-debug-lean.mk b/config/bootstrap-debug-lean.mk
index e215280b09f3..5f2db80687fa 100644
--- a/config/bootstrap-debug-lean.mk
+++ b/config/bootstrap-debug-lean.mk
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
STAGE2_CFLAGS += -fcompare-debug=
STAGE3_CFLAGS += -fcompare-debug
+do-compare = $(SHELL) $(srcdir)/contrib/compare-debug $$f1 $$f2
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
index b8f4e4888f1b..01d90808fd3b 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
@@ -23403,6 +23403,7 @@ gen_producer_string (void)
case OPT_fltrans_output_list_:
case OPT_fresolution_:
case OPT_fdebug_prefix_map_:
+ case OPT_fcompare_debug:
/* Ignore these. */
continue;
default:
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-11 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-06 1:15 Alexandre Oliva
2017-10-31 1:20 ` Jeff Law
2017-11-11 1:00 ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
2017-11-13 10:16 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ortvy11xi6.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org \
--to=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).