From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97234 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2015 18:44:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 97224 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2015 18:44:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:44:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D1A096FC; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freie.home (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6OIiA5x020532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:44:12 -0400 Received: from livre.home (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by freie.home (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t6OIhxdN013850; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:43:59 -0300 From: Alexandre Oliva To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Segher Boessenkool , Richard Biener , Jeff Law , GCC Patches , Christophe Lyon , David Edelsohn , Eric Botcazou Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand References: <20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (H. J. Lu's message of "Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:59:57 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02102.txt.bz2 On Jul 23, 2015, "H.J. Lu" wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983 My test logs with the patch have: PASS: c-c++-common/dfp/func-vararg-dfp.c execution test so I think this one is not caused by the PR64164 patch. -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer