From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41632 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2017 04:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41623 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2017 04:22:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:22:41 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDB28C00F7F5; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freie.home (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944EA5D973; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from livre (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by freie.home (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vBD3smoJ031840; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:54:48 -0200 From: Alexandre Oliva To: Christophe Lyon Cc: Jeff Law , Richard Biener , Jason Merrill , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [SFN+LVU+IEPM v4 6/9] [SFN] Introduce -gstatement-frontiers option, enable debug markers References: <20171110023448.28164-6-aoliva@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Christophe Lyon's message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:15:58 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg00788.txt.bz2 On Dec 12, 2017, Christophe Lyon wrote: > Since this was checked in, I've noticed GCC/libatomic build failures > on ARM targets when configuring > --with-mode thumb (--with-mode arm is OK). Could you possibly provide me with preprocessed source that exercises the error, so that I could duplicate and debug it with a cross compiler+assembler, without libc? Thanks in advance, (just in case, you might want to keep an eye on the patches in pr83396; patches there might already take care of this issue) -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer