public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: nd@arm.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com,
	Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com, richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH]AArch64 sve2: Fix expansion of division [PR107830]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:24:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <patch-16645-tamar@arm.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2094 bytes --]

Hi All,

SVE has an actual division optab, and when using -Os we don't
optimize the division away.  This means that we need to distinguish
between a div which we can optimize and one we cannot even during
expansion.

Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.

Ok for master?

Thanks,
Tamar

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR target/107830
	* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
	(aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant): Check validity during
	codegen phase as well.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR target/107830
	* gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/pr107830.c: New test.

--- inline copy of patch -- 
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 4176d7b046a126664360596b6db79a43e77ff76a..bee23625807af95d5ec15ad45702961b2d7ab55d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -24322,12 +24322,15 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
   if ((flags & VEC_ANY_SVE) && !TARGET_SVE2)
     return false;
 
+  wide_int val = wi::add (cst, 1);
+  int pow = wi::exact_log2 (val);
+  bool valid_p = pow == (int)(element_precision (vectype) / 2);
+  /* SVE actually has a div operator, we we may have gotten here through
+     that route.  */
   if (in0 == NULL_RTX && in1 == NULL_RTX)
-    {
-      wide_int val = wi::add (cst, 1);
-      int pow = wi::exact_log2 (val);
-      return pow == (int)(element_precision (vectype) / 2);
-    }
+    return valid_p;
+  else if (!valid_p)
+    return false;
 
   if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (vectype))
    return false;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/pr107830.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/pr107830.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d8ee3615fdb0083dbde1e45a2826fb681726139
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/pr107830.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target fopenmp } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-Os -fopenmp" } */
+
+void
+f2 (int *a)
+{
+  unsigned int i;
+
+#pragma omp simd
+  for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
+    a[i / 3] -= 4;
+}




-- 

[-- Attachment #2: rb16645.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1493 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 4176d7b046a126664360596b6db79a43e77ff76a..bee23625807af95d5ec15ad45702961b2d7ab55d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -24322,12 +24322,15 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
   if ((flags & VEC_ANY_SVE) && !TARGET_SVE2)
     return false;
 
+  wide_int val = wi::add (cst, 1);
+  int pow = wi::exact_log2 (val);
+  bool valid_p = pow == (int)(element_precision (vectype) / 2);
+  /* SVE actually has a div operator, we we may have gotten here through
+     that route.  */
   if (in0 == NULL_RTX && in1 == NULL_RTX)
-    {
-      wide_int val = wi::add (cst, 1);
-      int pow = wi::exact_log2 (val);
-      return pow == (int)(element_precision (vectype) / 2);
-    }
+    return valid_p;
+  else if (!valid_p)
+    return false;
 
   if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (vectype))
    return false;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/pr107830.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/pr107830.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d8ee3615fdb0083dbde1e45a2826fb681726139
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/pr107830.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target fopenmp } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-Os -fopenmp" } */
+
+void
+f2 (int *a)
+{
+  unsigned int i;
+
+#pragma omp simd
+  for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
+    a[i / 3] -= 4;
+}




             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-23 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-23 14:24 Tamar Christina [this message]
2022-11-23 16:17 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-24 18:35   ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-24 18:44     ` Richard Sandiford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=patch-16645-tamar@arm.com \
    --to=tamar.christina@arm.com \
    --cc=Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).