From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5949F38F14F2 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 06:34:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5949F38F14F2 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 5949F38F14F2 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1717569256; cv=none; b=JbYS68O/b7setn7vCtaFKQ6KhcWrZw0KnpsXolZFuMf1lg5FxDnCsHe88itPK/AMlW0EpfnM9Zvfnq/6ym/Jzlhp7bjj6YoNbpjU2uIwtD72xFoua23r69KNQdGQsK+qoXLQFfjGqKxCLryuDt8uA+lg4xeH7IAvMQkuIc3Qm8k= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1717569256; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u1q9nfbP6j7dyJlQSbPyXi7D+rYIcv3Ff70FOnGouBI=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Date: From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=Y6fCyqFlbRMJ0N2ljK4U00J2KrGewyg0k+OJESbPPeH8TvFPgy5c1H27iR5hpg5rfesV8XZrKtoH8EWSe1CCalpPwM1+6DDuL1It6YxKsOlYOLYXI6usKka1l07cCF9KyfDo4zolWKgUCIqPCI6TG1cXt9YDokZ4Tk6m5eB6i9E= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from murzim.nue2.suse.org (unknown [10.168.4.243]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668BF1F797; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 06:34:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1717569253; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7XnFSs0MpJqMeXUJHpqArpW6SMUdd0QithjiOW7C0JA=; b=bAiQULEpdRRlJhhEY5L7wn8fxrxr+ZK8WCrR4xpZATYY1yIdKXfg0WCNvgkiJnakJvw6Pn qIUUhExKp22HSQjwEQVP8JLDVS37eBsih9Gv2+xcfMPU3GjZB7NQPkYq9cOZNyJH6Q1WjJ CRmrnGGfj1qTaEgf1ekib1TPHHlyHHM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1717569253; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7XnFSs0MpJqMeXUJHpqArpW6SMUdd0QithjiOW7C0JA=; b=AKu+hZzsGKNyklDH0+DY2IrERSyCLl3hNcmsvSs/5+KI7Tjx8IM0AQTSuXr1b8AY0JgHIs PWSA5Ci5C2IlGiBQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1717569253; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7XnFSs0MpJqMeXUJHpqArpW6SMUdd0QithjiOW7C0JA=; b=bAiQULEpdRRlJhhEY5L7wn8fxrxr+ZK8WCrR4xpZATYY1yIdKXfg0WCNvgkiJnakJvw6Pn qIUUhExKp22HSQjwEQVP8JLDVS37eBsih9Gv2+xcfMPU3GjZB7NQPkYq9cOZNyJH6Q1WjJ CRmrnGGfj1qTaEgf1ekib1TPHHlyHHM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1717569253; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7XnFSs0MpJqMeXUJHpqArpW6SMUdd0QithjiOW7C0JA=; b=AKu+hZzsGKNyklDH0+DY2IrERSyCLl3hNcmsvSs/5+KI7Tjx8IM0AQTSuXr1b8AY0JgHIs PWSA5Ci5C2IlGiBQ== Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:34:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Biener To: Thomas Schwinge cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka , "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: Clarify that 'gcc.dg/initpri3.c' is a LTO variant of 'gcc.dg/initpri1.c': 'gcc.dg/initpri1-lto.c' [PR46083] (was: PR lto/46083 (destructor priorities are wrong)) In-Reply-To: <87y17kejqz.fsf@euler.schwinge.ddns.net> Message-ID: References: <20110109010150.GE28524@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20110109175631.GA21649@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <87y17kejqz.fsf@euler.schwinge.ddns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="-1475677436-2007932338-1717569253=:10243" X-Spam-Score: -1.80 X-Spam-Level: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.80 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; CTYPE_MIXED_BOGUS(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.991]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gcc.gnu.org,ucw.cz,gmail.com]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[murzim.nue2.suse.org:helo,suse.de:email] X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1475677436-2007932338-1717569253=:10243 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 4 Jun 2024, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On 2011-01-10T13:56:06+0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote: > >> On 2011-01-09T07:24:57-0800, "H.J. Lu" wrote: > >> > On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > >> > > the PR is about testsuite/initpri1.c failing with lto. > >> > > > >> > > I am not sure why the testcase is not run with -flto flags. It is declared as > >> > > /* { dg-do run { target init_priority } } */ and thus I would expect all > >> > > default flags > >> > > to be cycled over. > >> > > >> > It is because it isn't in lto nor torture directories. > > >> > > The problem is simple - FINI_PRIORITY is not streamed at all.  [...] > >> > > >> > Can you add a testcase? > >> > >> Copying initpri1.c into lto directory should do the trick then, right? > >> I will give it a try. > > > > Ok with a testcase. > > No need for "Copying initpri1.c" if there's '#include "initpri1.c"'. ;-P > (In preparation for further changes) OK to push the attached > "Clarify that 'gcc.dg/initpri3.c' is a LTO variant of 'gcc.dg/initpri1.c': 'gcc.dg/initpri1-lto.c' [PR46083]"? OK. ---1475677436-2007932338-1717569253=:10243--