public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>,
	 "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH]middle-end convert negate + right shift into compare greater.
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:06:50 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <qpp49220-145r-65p9-2o51-1415n72486op@fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR08MB532555ED0B6F6B80740F46C0FFB99@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Tamar Christina wrote:

> > >
> > > +/* Fold (-x >> C) into x > 0 where C = precision(type) - 1.  */ (for
> > > +cst (INTEGER_CST VECTOR_CST)  (simplify
> > > +  (rshift (negate:s @0) cst@1)
> > > +   (if (!flag_wrapv)
> > 
> > Don't test flag_wrapv directly, instead use the appropriate
> > TYPE_OVERFLOW_{UNDEFINED,WRAPS} predicates.  But I'm not sure what
> > we are protecting against?  Right-shift of signed integers is implementation-
> > defined and GCC treats it as you'd expect, sign-extending the result.
> > 
> 
> It's protecting against the overflow of the negate on INT_MIN. When wrapping
> overflows are enabled the results would be wrong.

But -INT_MIN == INT_MIN in twos-complement so I fail to see the wrong
result?  That is, both -INT_MIN >> 31 and INT_MIN >> 31 are -1.

> > > +    (with { tree ctype = TREE_TYPE (@0);
> > > +	    tree stype = TREE_TYPE (@1);
> > > +	    tree bt = truth_type_for (ctype); }
> > > +     (switch
> > > +      /* Handle scalar case.  */
> > > +      (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (ctype)
> > > +	   && !VECTOR_TYPE_P (ctype)
> > > +	   && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (ctype)
> > > +	   && canonicalize_math_after_vectorization_p ()
> > > +	   && wi::eq_p (wi::to_wide (@1), TYPE_PRECISION (stype) - 1))
> > > +       (convert:bt (gt:bt @0 { build_zero_cst (stype); })))
> > 
> > I'm not sure why the result is of type 'bt' rather than the original type of the
> > expression?
> 
> That was to satisfy some RTL check that expected results of comparisons to always
> be a Boolean, though for scalar that logically always is the case, I just added it
> for consistency.
> 
> > 
> > In that regard for non-vectors we'd have to add the sign extension from
> > unsigned bool, in the vector case we'd hope the type of the comparison is
> > correct.  I think in both cases it might be convenient to use
> > 
> >   (cond (gt:bt @0 { build_zero_cst (ctype); }) { build_all_ones_cst (ctype); }
> > { build_zero_cost (ctype); })
> > 
> > to compute the correct result and rely on (cond ..) simplifications to simplify
> > that if possible.
> > 
> > Btw, 'stype' should be irrelevant - you need to look at the precision of 'ctype',
> > no?
> 
> I was working under the assumption that both input types must have the same
> precision, but turns out that assumption doesn't need to hold.
> 
> New version attached.
> 
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu,
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and no regressions.
> 
> Ok for master?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tamar
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* match.pd: New negate+shift pattern.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/signbit-2.c: New test.
> 	* gcc.dg/signbit-3.c: New test.
> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/signbit-1.c: New test.
> 
> --- inline copy of patch ---
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
> index 7d2a24dbc5e9644a09968f877e12a824d8ba1caa..9532cae582e152cae6e22fcce95a9744a844e3c2 100644
> --- a/gcc/match.pd
> +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>     uniform_integer_cst_p
>     HONOR_NANS
>     uniform_vector_p
> -   bitmask_inv_cst_vector_p)
> +   bitmask_inv_cst_vector_p
> +   expand_vec_cmp_expr_p)
>  
>  /* Operator lists.  */
>  (define_operator_list tcc_comparison
> @@ -826,6 +827,42 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
>      { tree utype = unsigned_type_for (type); }
>      (convert (rshift (lshift (convert:utype @0) @2) @3))))))
>  
> +/* Fold (-x >> C) into x > 0 where C = precision(type) - 1.  */
> +(for cst (INTEGER_CST VECTOR_CST)
> + (simplify
> +  (rshift (negate:s @0) cst@1)
> +   (if (!TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type))

as said, I don't think that's necessary but at least it's now
written correctly ;)

> +    (with { tree ctype = TREE_TYPE (@0);

Instead of 'ctype' you can use 'type' since the type of the expression
is the same as that of @0

> +	    tree stype = TREE_TYPE (@1);
> +	    tree bt = truth_type_for (ctype);
> +	    tree zeros = build_zero_cst (ctype); }
> +     (switch
> +      /* Handle scalar case.  */
> +      (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (ctype)
> +	   && !VECTOR_TYPE_P (ctype)

INTEGRAL_TYPE_P does not include VECTOR_TYPE_P.

> +	   && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (ctype)
> +	   && canonicalize_math_after_vectorization_p ()
> +	   && wi::eq_p (wi::to_wide (@1), TYPE_PRECISION (ctype) - 1))
> +       (cond (gt:bt @0 { zeros; }) { build_all_ones_cst (ctype); } { zeros; }))
> +      /* Handle vector case with a scalar immediate.  */
> +      (if (VECTOR_INTEGER_TYPE_P (ctype)
> +	   && !VECTOR_TYPE_P (stype)
> +	   && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (ctype)
> +	   && expand_vec_cmp_expr_p (ctype, ctype, { GT_EXPR }))
> +       (with { HOST_WIDE_INT bits = GET_MODE_UNIT_BITSIZE (TYPE_MODE (ctype)); }
> +	(if (wi::eq_p (wi::to_wide (@1), bits - 1))

You can use element_precision (@0) - 1 in both the scalar and vector case.

> +	 (convert:bt (gt:bt @0 { zeros; })))))
> +      /* Handle vector case with a vector immediate.   */
> +      (if (VECTOR_INTEGER_TYPE_P (ctype)
> +	   && VECTOR_TYPE_P (stype)
> +	   && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (ctype)
> +	   && uniform_vector_p (@1)
> +	   && expand_vec_cmp_expr_p (ctype, ctype, { GT_EXPR }))
> +       (with { tree cst = vector_cst_elt (@1, 0);
> +	       HOST_WIDE_INT bits = GET_MODE_UNIT_BITSIZE (TYPE_MODE (ctype)); }
> +        (if (wi::eq_p (wi::to_wide (cst), bits - 1))
> +	 (convert:bt (gt:bt @0 { zeros; }))))))))))

The (convert:bt are not necessary.  Note that 'ctype' is not a valid
mask type but we eventually will be forgiving enough here.  You are
computing thruth_type_for, asking for gt:bt but checking
expand_vec_cmp_expr_p (ctype, ctype, ...), that's inconsistent and
will lead to problems on targets with AVX512VL + AVX2 which will
have a AVX2 compare of say V4SImode producing a V4SImode mask
but thruth_type_for will give you a QImode vector type.

As said the most general transform would be to

 (cond (gt:bt @0 { zeros; }) { build_zero_cst (ctype); } { 
build_all_ones_cst (ctype); })

if you think that's not better than the negate + shift but only
when the compare will directly produce the desired result then
I think you have to either drop the truth_type_for and manually
build the truthtype or check that the mode of the truth type
and the value type match.  And you need to produce

  (view_convert:ctype (gt:bt @0 { zeros; }))

then.

> +
>  /* Fold (C1/X)*C2 into (C1*C2)/X.  */
>  (simplify
>   (mult (rdiv@3 REAL_CST@0 @1) REAL_CST@2)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/signbit-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/signbit-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc0157cbc5c7996b481f2998bc30176c96a669bb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/signbit-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* { dg-do assemble } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O3 --save-temps -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> +
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +void fun1(int32_t *x, int n)
> +{
> +    for (int i = 0; i < (n & -16); i++)
> +      x[i] = (-x[i]) >> 31;
> +}
> +
> +void fun2(int32_t *x, int n)
> +{
> +    for (int i = 0; i < (n & -16); i++)
> +      x[i] = (-x[i]) >> 30;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {\s+>\s+\{ 0, 0, 0, 0 \}} 1 optimized } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {\s+>>\s+31} optimized } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/signbit-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/signbit-3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19e9c06c349b3287610f817628f00938ece60bf7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/signbit-3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-do assemble } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O1 --save-temps -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> +
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +void fun1(int32_t *x, int n)
> +{
> +    for (int i = 0; i < (n & -16); i++)
> +      x[i] = (-x[i]) >> 31;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {\s+>\s+0;} 1 optimized } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {\s+>>\s+31} optimized } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/signbit-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/signbit-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ebfb0586f37de29cf58635b27fe48503714447e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/signbit-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* { dg-do assemble } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O3 --save-temps" } */
> +
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +void fun1(int32_t *x, int n)
> +{
> +    for (int i = 0; i < (n & -16); i++)
> +      x[i] = (-x[i]) >> 31;
> +}
> +
> +void fun2(int32_t *x, int n)
> +{
> +    for (int i = 0; i < (n & -16); i++)
> +      x[i] = (-x[i]) >> 30;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tcmgt\t} 1 } } */
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-15  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-05 12:50 Tamar Christina
2021-10-05 12:56 ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-10-05 13:30   ` Tamar Christina
2021-10-05 13:34     ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-10-05 13:49       ` Tamar Christina
2021-10-05 13:51         ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-10-05 13:56           ` Tamar Christina
2021-10-07 12:46             ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-10-11 11:36               ` Tamar Christina
2021-10-13 12:11                 ` Richard Biener
2021-10-15  7:48                   ` Tamar Christina
2021-10-15  9:06                     ` Richard Biener [this message]
2021-10-15 10:36                       ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-10-15 10:57                         ` Richard Biener
2021-10-15 11:55                       ` Tamar Christina
     [not found]                         ` <VI1PR08MB5325D87574F2D09568EF5C40FF849@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
     [not found]                           ` <34p8433-751p-2n5s-qp50-r8rss490npop@fhfr.qr>
2021-11-03 13:21                             ` Tamar Christina
2021-11-04 13:06                               ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=qpp49220-145r-65p9-2o51-1415n72486op@fhfr.qr \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=Tamar.Christina@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).